The virus that doesn't exist: lies and consequences

by Jon Rappoport on Jon Rappoport

This material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes.
The views expressed are solely those of the authors or commentators and may or may not reflect those of canal666.

Throughout this false pandemic, I've been listing and explaining the falling dominos:

The false claim that a virus exists.

The development of a diagnostic test to detect the virus that doesn't exist.

Based on the test, the publishing of sky-high case numbers, all of which are obviously meaningless.

Based on the false case numbers, and absurd computer projections of cases and deaths to come, the imprisoning of people in their homes, the closure and destruction of businesses, the torpedoing of economies, and then…

The introduction of a highly destructive vaccine as the solution.

These are the consequences that flowed from the fake "discovery" of a new virus.

Lately, there has been a resurgence of interest in one or two documents I cited months ago. These documents reveal the hoax at the bottom of the test for a virus that doesn't exist. The documents, written by the builders of the test, admit an isolated specimen of the virus is NOT AVAILABLE. But they're going to devise a test for it anyway.

This is on the order of a doctor telling a patient, "I'm going to test you for Disease XQ."

The patient asks, "What is disease XQ?"

The doctor answers, "We have NO IDEA. But we want to find out whether you have it."

Let's go to the first Smoking Gun.

The CDC document is titled, "CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel." It was originally published in February 2020, in the very early days of the "pandemic," and it's latest revision was published in July 2021 (rev: 07, 7/21).

Buried deep in the document, in a section titled, "Performance Characteristics," we have this: "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…" (document page 40, pdf page 41)

The key phrase there is: "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [virus] are currently available…"

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term "quantified" in that phrase means: the CDC has no virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

One of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world can't obtain the virus from anywhere. Why? Obviously, because no one has it.

A further tip-off is the use of the word 'isolates." This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.

Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

As if this were not a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test, in that very paper I'm citing, to detect the virus-that-hasn't-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn't been proved to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world would go on to count COVID cases and deaths…and governments instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.

And now, let's move on to a second key document. This one formed the basis for the first PCR test aimed at detecting the COVID virus all over the world.

READ WHAT THIS STUDY SAYS. These quotes should be engraved in stone above the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical fraud.

"We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology [a test for a virus] for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available."

TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new COVID virus without having the virus.

"Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with [the older 2003] SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology."

TRANSLATION: We HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new COVID virus. We ASSUME this new virus exists and is closely related to an older coronavirus. We ASSUME we know HOW it is related. We ASSUME, because we don't have the new COVID virus. Therefore, all our assumptions are made out of nothing. Actually, we have no proof there is a new coronavirus.

"The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from [the older 2003] SARS-CoV."

TRANSLATION: Our new test to detect the new virus? We don't have the new virus. We've never observed it. We can't study it directly. There is no proof it exists. But we will create and use a test to detect it.

The study is titled, "Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR." [Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):2000045. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.]

Those quotes from the study are astounding. A diagnostic test for the virus, but there is no virus. No standard against which to compare the reliability of the test.

The authors blithely assume they can somehow infer that the virus exists in the first place, without having an isolated specimen.

Then they assume they can understand the structure of the virus that isn't there.

The virus isn't there. It has NOT been isolated. It has NOT been separated out from other material. Therefore, it has not been observed and its existence has not been proved.

And yet, the test which these authors have developed is launched, all over the world, to detect that virus; to promote the unproven notion that there is a pandemic; to form the basis for counting COVID case numbers; and ultimately to justify all the lockdowns which have crashed the global economy and destroyed millions upon millions of lives.

A great deal of confusion has been created, because scientists talk about the "new virus" as if they understand its structure and genetic sequence. No. They've built a hypothetical structure, AS DATA. Nothing more. And then they gibber about what it means.

As far as what is actually going on in labs where researchers are making vast assumptions and proclamations; don't talk to me about science. Talk to me about liability and prison.

At the site, fluoridefreepeel.ca, you will find roughly a hundred FOIA requests to public health agencies. These requests are asking for records showing that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated. The repetitive and routine reply is: "We have no records." Taken together, they paint a picture of egregious fraud.

Mainstream scientists will make two claims: one, we have isolated the virus; and two, it is not necessary to isolate the virus, because we've discovered its genetic sequence. Both claims are false.

From reading the arcane language surrounding claims of having sequenced the virus-there is a multi-layered scam composed of leaps of unwarranted assumptions. The researchers say they are using tools that allow them to closely approximate the structure of SARS-CoV-2, even though they don't have that virus in hand. This is absurd.

It's like saying: There is a new planet in the solar system. We don't know where it is or what it looks like. We don't know what processes are at work on this new planet. But we do know the moon is a very close approximation of the planet. Therefore, we can know everything we need to know about the new planet from our knowledge of the moon.

And a rabbit is spaceship. And there are condos for sale on Jupiter. And new element #267587, in the Periodic Table, which no one has ever seen, is almost an exact copy of Philadelphia Cream Cheese.

And now we come to a third document, which bulges with devastating admissions. It was issued by the CDC.

The release is titled, "07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing." It begins explosively:

"After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives."

Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of "detecting the virus." The CDC isn't saying that at all.

They're saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they're replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better "reference sample." A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.

CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020-right up to July 21, 2021.

In other words, the millions and millions of "COVID cases" based on the PCR test in use are all suspect. Actually, that statement is too generous. Every test result of every PCR test should be thrown out.

To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, "SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data." Here is a killer quote:

"During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics, the PCR test] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs [tests] based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources."

Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, and that's the test we've been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of 'the virus'. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn't have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.

This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, "…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources."

Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus-the virus we didn't have. Obviously, then, these tests would give useless and meaningless results. It was all a fantasy.

BUT, don't worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual isolated virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.

In other words, they were lying THEN, but they're not lying NOW. They were "contriving," but now they're telling the truth.

If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.

We KNOW they are lying now, because they continue to torture the meaning of the word "isolate." Here, once again, I report virology's version of "we possess isolated specimens of the virus":

They have a soup they make in their labs.

This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus.

This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients, and that starvation could kill the cells.

There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.

Yet the researchers call cell-death "isolation of the virus."

To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, "We assume, without proof, we have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab" equals, "We've separated the virus from all surrounding material."

Virology equals "how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world and lock it down and shoot it up with a devastating destructive vaccine." Other than that, it's perfect.

  • 10 comments
    last comments from Jon Rappoport
    Interested Observer Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:55:27 +0000

    My query is a logistical one. Assuming that it is possible to produce one jab dose per second, it would take nearly 32 years to produce one billion doses. Currently, 7.81 billion have been administered to unsuspecting victims, all allegedly manufactured in the last 9 to 12 months. Unless they have tens of thousands of labs worldwide, working 24/7, they have had to have been producing this 'vaccine' for some considerable time and Covid 19 hoax was a "window of opportunity", to quote a certain Mr Schwab.

    :colin: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 21:49:45 +0000

    That is exactly what the establishment do not want us to do Maggie…think. We might discover some uncomfortable truths, such as, the real medicines that man and woman (not human (the colour of man), not person (the fake persona, or actors mask) and not people (Blacks Law Dictionary states that the word people means beasts/monsters) need to thrive are found out in the fields, woodlands and hedgerows, and, being natural, cannot be patented. Bang goes big pharma profits. We might also find out that the history that we learn during our years of education (or indoctrination) has been written in such a way as show us what "they" want us to believe. Or that the only winners in any war are the banks that lend both sides the money to fight that war (at vast expense to both sides, usually ending up with bankrupt countries). You might just discover the truth about Tartaria which would make them very uneasy. Also, you could discover about your legal fiction (or you may know it as your strawman) which really would make them uncomfortable. What about the inextricably connected sinking of the Titanic and the federal reserve? What about the cancer act just after the second World War (which is why David Noakes has been so unfairly persecuted)? Why has colloidal silver gone so out of fashion now (oh yeah…again, they can't patent it)? And many many other things that, if the global population knew about, the global elite, the cabal, would instantly become the targets in everybodies sights. They have been poisoning the food we eat, the water we drink and the air that we breath, not to mention the medication that they give us, not to cure us, but to mask the simptoms (because those that are well do not have to pay medical bills…big pharma don't make cures), and, I believe, 80%+ of big pharma "medication" is made as a by-product of the oil industry (the petro-chemical industry), and before the scientists starting "learning their craft", nature provided all the cures we needed for all of the ailments that we picked up. The establishment really REALLY don't want us to think for ourselves Maggie. But please, do not believe what I have written here, but go and find out for yourself. It is all out there. I would even go so far as to say that ignorance is a choice in this day and age.

    :colin: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 20:10:25 +0000

    Many a true word said in jest…

    Lisa H Sun, 24 Oct 2021 01:58:01 +0000

    Another great article that coincides with what Jon has been writing about.

    https://liftingtones.com/2021/10/24/wheres-the-virus/

    Barney Rubble Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:27:08 +0000

    For quite some time in 2020 I kept reading that the virus had never been isolated. I had remained a Covid skeptic all along due to my work being deemed essential and the nature of my work never having come across ANYONE actually sick while working in hundreds of OTHER PEOPLES HOMES. Finally, I discovered the Cormen-Drosten Review which outlines the numerous fatal flaws of the Drosten PCR protocol on which the tests are based worldwide. The most fatal flaw is of course that the genomic sequence was "theorized" by Drosten. Frustratingly, however there is another seemingly always overlooked aspect and that is the specificity of the genes used for the assay panel. The Cormen-Drosten review outlines the importance of proper gene selection for accurate specificity to be at least 3 genes with 2 of them being as far apart on the strand as possible. Two of 3 could be right next to each other but in order to ensure something specific is being tested for, the 3rd gene must be far apart. Well lo and behold confirming that the FDA-RT-PCR-EUA 1st written in February 2020 did in fact use the CONTRIVED genomic sequence from Drosten and makes the statements referenced in this post by JR. This is smoking gun proof of CONTRIVING the Pandemic. BUT CRUCIALLY, on 15 March 2020 (the date is important) Revision 1 was released removing N3, the 3rd gene. This is the literal FLIPPING THE ON SWITCH ON. Yes the EUA allows 40 cycles and that is consequential but removing the 3rd gene ensured there would be exponential explosion of cases. REMOVING THE 3RD GENE IS THE MOST CONSEQUENTIAL EVIDENCE. WHY IS NO ONE TALKING ABOUT IT? Ultimately searching for and finding some of the 60-odd FDA RT-PCR protocols one can find some that eliminated the 2nd gene as well! This was done in the false purpose of being sure to catch variants which don't actually exist. So now tests which popped positives can be done at 45 cycles and searching for only 1 gene that could literally be a segment of the genomic sequence of A TRILLION things and subsequently cause all the impacts to a life family and community of a Covid-positive case.
    THE PCR TESTS ARE FRAUD. ALL COVID HYSTERIA CRUMBLES FROM THAT FACT. ALL WAS MANIPULATED TO THE END OF MAKING THIS AS BAD AS POSSIBLE TO DRIVE VOTING AND LEGISLATION TO TAKE AWAY MORE OF OUR RIGHTS. IT ENDS WHEN WE SAY IT DOES. WHEN ENOUGH PEOPLE STOP COMPLYING WITH PROPAGANDIZED PSEUDO SCIENCE.

    LookUp Wed, 20 Oct 2021 18:13:13 +0000

    Revelations also says a plague will affect the world and John described it as a stinging insect with the face of a man and the body of a horse.

    Didn't make much sense when I read it 20 years ago but it does now.

    Luus Wed, 20 Oct 2021 18:04:32 +0000

    The perfect and devastating critique that exposes the very root of this gigantic fraud, and that many alternative researchers still refuse to mention: THERE IS NO VIRUS! IT'S A PHANTOM PATHOGEN, PERIOD! And no, it is not a distraction as some of them have suggested, it is a crucial point that opens the door to a "new" (in fact old) health paradigm, that is, terrain and not fake pathogens as the cause of illness and death.

    Thanks Jon for pointing to the emperor's virus from day one.

    MAGGIE IN FL Mon, 18 Oct 2021 21:53:32 +0000

    Read your Bible, Revelations and the "mark of the beast".

    It states that if you do NOT have the mark (injection) you will not be able to buy food or anything as only those who have accepted the mark can buy food etc.

    When John wrote about it, there was no injections and virus known.

    The communist part of our government says if you do not have the covid shots then you are SOL getting food etc.

    The vaccine is to trace you, know what you are doing 24/7.

    So many sheeple are flowing thru getting 3+ shots to stay safe? and then getting sick and dying.

    THINK PEOPLE, USE THE GRAY MATTER BEHIND YOUR EYES.

    MAGGIE IN FL Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:39:51 +0000

    Fauci, the wee one who has prayer candles in his bookcase with his picture wearing the vestments of a priest, apparently needed some money so he shouted fire in the theater, so to speak. He is getting paid more than Biden because of his "allowing" us to celebrate Christmas and Thanksgiving. Makes him fee important which he gets satisfaction from. I say he has Napoleon syndrome (don't know if it exists which makes "little man" feel important that he can tell the sheeple when to jump and when to go potty. He has now issued an edict that WE can celebrate Thanksgiving and Christmas. I guess his prayer candles have told him it is okay. Biden is thinning our military and increasing the illegal army in case we AMERICANS take back our country. I am not university educated but have plenty of COMMON SENSE to know that pneumonia is a killer and people get it all the time and minor versions called "the flu", and know that the edict "If you do not take the covid shots you will have no job, no food, nothing, but if you take the fake shots then you will be able to work, buy food, etc. Read about it in Revalations.

    G. Washington Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:27:24 +0000

    More Bombshell Major Breaking News!! Oct. 18, 2021

    Here is ONE WAY (potentially) how Universities/Colleges were paid off…to implement the communist "covid" medical protocols on their customers-students and their employees…all of 2020 and all of 2021.

    Boston University 41 percent gain in one year!!!

    All 4 of these Universities…(Harvard, BC, BU, MIT) some of the strictest covid protocols in the country. Harvard…requires their students-customers to take a fraudulent Covid PCR test (With Ethylene Oxide Swab tips) twice a week…in order for their (Harvard) customers-students to receive what they are paying for… Best part. There is no declared "covid" public health emergency in the state of Massachusetts. (And…Indoor masks with no exemptions, PCR Tests with no exemptions…at all 4 Universities…Brown University same…no exemptions for indoor masks and PCR testing…100 percent mandatory).

    "The numbers make Powerball look like a church raffle: $11.3 billion for Harvard University, $9 billion for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, $1.2 billion for Boston College, $960 million for Boston University."

    "In the past year, private investments made up for some of that disaster, generating outsize gains. Harvard's private equity portfolio returned 77 percent; at Brown University, where the endowment ended June with $6.9 billion, private equity was up 87 percent, driving an overall 51.5 percent return, the biggest since 1983."

    100 percent proof-evidence of racketeering, abuse of power, crimes against humanity, and fraud? Reader: You be the Judge.

    https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/10/18/business/universities-hit-jackpot-with-billions-dollars-endowment-gains/

  • write comment
Text to Speech by: ResponsiveVoice-NonCommercial licensed under 95x15
website no use cookies, no spying, no tracking
to use the website, we check:
country: PL · city: · ip: 3.239.95.36
device: computer · browser: CCBot 2 · platform:
counter: 1 · online: 666
created and powered by:
www.RobiYogi.com - Professional Responsive Websites
00:00
00:00
 please wait loading data...