The Misanthropic Bankers Behind COP26 and the Green New Deal

by Matthew Ehret on Off Guardian

This material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes.
The views expressed are solely those of the authors or commentators and may or may not reflect those of canal666.

A vast sweeping change towards a "green economy" is now being pushed by forces that may make an educated citizen rather uncomfortable.

Of course, news reports flash daily showcasing the brave young movement of "eco-warriors" led by Sweden's "forever 15 year old" Greta Thunberg or America's 17 year old Jamie Margolin who have become a force across Europe and America leading such movements as the Extinction Rebellion, This is Zero Hour, the Sunrise Movement and Children's eco-crusade.

The young face of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez daily sells the idea that the only way for outdated capitalist forces that have plagued the world for decades to be replaced is by imposing a sweeping Green New Deal that priorities de-carbonization as a goal for humanity rather than continuing to allow the mindless forces of the markets to determine our destiny.

When EU President Ursula von der Leyen had stepped into her office, she lost no time attacking China's Belt and Road Initiative (which is ironically representing a true 21st century New Deal) by saying:

…some are buying their influence by investing in dependence from ports and roads [but] we go the European way."

What is the "European way"? Not the development plans of Charles De Gaulle or Konrad Adenauer who envisioned industrial growth and increasing population as positives, but rather a Green New Deal.

Von der Leyen then announced that:

I want Europe to become the first CO2 neutral continent in the world by 2050! I will put forward a Green New Deal for Europe in my first 100 days in office…"

Attacking the "mindless forces of the market" and vested power structures of capitalism are not bad things to do…but why must we de-carbonize? Re-regulating the too-big-to-fail banks is long overdue, but why do so many assume that a "Green New Deal" won't just empower those same forces that have run havoc upon the world for the past half-century and just cause more death and starvation than has already been suffered under Globalization?

One might only think to even ask such questions by first confronting the uncomfortable fact that behind such young cardboard cutouts as Thunberg, Margolin, Cortez or the Green New Deal are figures whom one would not associate with humanitarianism by any measure.

Green Bonds and Oligarchs
When we begin to pull back the curtain we quickly run into figures like Prince Charles, who recently met with the heads of 18 Commonwealth countries to consolidate climate emergency legislation which was promptly passed in the UK and Canadian Parliaments.

At the end of the meeting Charles said that we "have 18 months to save the world from climate change" and called for "increasing the amount of private sector finance flowing towards the supporting of sustainable development throughout the commonwealth".

Following the royal decree, the Bank of England and some of the dirtiest banks in the Rothschild-City of London web of finance have promoted "green financial instruments" led by Green Bonds to redirect pension plans and mutual funds towards green projects that no one in their right minds would ever invest in willfully.

The Ecological, Social, Governance Index (ESGI) has now been set up across 51% of Germany's banks including the derivatives-bomb waiting to blow named Deutschebank. Leading bankers supporting the ESGI like Mark Carney of the Bank of England have said that over 6.5 trillion Euros could be mobilized under this new index (which currently accounts for about $160 billion).

The creation of these "green bonds" run hand-in-hand with the Bail-in mechanisms which have now been implemented across the trans-Atlantic nations in order to steal trillions of dollars of from pension funds, RRSPs and Mutual funds the next time a bailout is needed to prop up the "too big to fails" which currently sit atop a $1.2 trillion derivatives bubble waiting to blow.

On top of heading the Bank of England, former Goldman Sachs-man Carney has also endorsed the Financial Stability Board's Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures which was created in 2015 and was used as a guideline for the UK government's July 2019 White Paper "Green Finance Strategy: Transforming Finance for a Greener Future".

The White Paper proposed to:

consolidate the UK's position as a global hub for green finance and positioning the UK at the head of green financial innovation and data and analytics…endorsed by institutions representing $118 trillion of assets globally."

The Carney-led Task Force also spawned the Green Finance Initiative in 2016 which is now a primary vehicle designed to divert international capital flows into green tech.

Carney's former employer at Goldman Sachs has also created a "Green Index for 'virtuous investing" including two new sustainability indices to promote heavy investment in to green infrastructure called CDP Environment EW and CDP Eurozone EW.

The acronym CDP originates from the Climate Disclosure Project – a London-based think tank that generated Goldman Sachs' program. Goldman Sachs' Marine Abiad promoted the CDP index saying on July 10 "we are convinced that sustainable finance enables financial markets to play a virtuous role in the economy."

Just in case you thought the Extinction Rebellion was somehow untouched by the hand of social engineers, a leading figure behind the movement named Alex Evans was a former consultant on the Prince's International Sustainability Unit, and co-author of the US National Intelligence Council's Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World which became an environmental/foreign policy blueprint for the Obama Administration in 2008. Currently Evans also runs the Collective Psychology Project "where psychology meets politics".

Other leading British intelligence figures managing the Extinction Rebellion movement included Farhana Yamin and Sam Gaell of Chatham House (the controlling institution behind the New York Council on Foreign Relations).

Could a 'Benevolent' Green Dictatorship be a Good Thing?
The devil's advocate speaks: Can't we presume that these central banks, oligarchs and hedge fund managers just care about the environment? So what if they are trying to modify humanity's behaviour in order to save the environment?

After all, humanity itself is a selfish, gluttonous pollution-making machine and isn't better for everyone if those enlightened elite just transform the world economy so that we consume less, and think more about the future?

If this line of thinking approximates something you've felt inside yourself then you've been brainwashed.

Of course, the world has turned into a consumerist cult over the past few decades which has sacrificed long term thinking for short term gain and of course we need a re-organization of the system. Thunberg and the Green New Dealers aren't wrong about that stuff. That's all fine and dandy.

But if you think that going along with the types of reform that aspires to put dollar values on reducing carbon footprints or spreading low quality (and very expensive) windmills and solar panels across the globe with the expectation that somehow these sources of energy will not cause a vast collapse of industrial capacity of civilization (and an associated loss of capacity to sustain human life), then you are fooling yourself.

One kilowatt of windmill energy is only the same as one kilowatt of nuclear power when applied to a mathematical equation but not in real life. When applied to capital-intensive work functions needed to melt industrial steel, run machine tools, power a vast agro-industrial complex, high-speed rail system or construct things like Belt and Road Initiative, "green" energy sources do not come even close to cutting the iron.

The issue has always been population control
The oligarchs running the "grand green design" since the Club of Rome's Sir Alexander King began the Limits to Growth study in 1970 knew that green "low energy flux density" sources of energy would constrict global population and that is exactly what they wanted.

Sir King said as much in 1990 when he wrote:

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."

Sir King was, after all just following the lead of UNESCO founder (and Eugenics president) Sir Julian Huxley who wrote in 1946:

Political unification in some sort of world government will be required…Even though…any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable."

It was only a few years later that Huxley would co-found the World Wildlife Fund alongside Prince Philip Mountbatten and Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands.

All three were present at Bernhardt's founding meeting of the Bilderberg group to advance this grand conversion of society into a willful self-extermination in 1954 and while Huxley wasn't present in 1970, the other two oligarchs co-founded the 1001 Nature Trust alongside 999 other wealthy misanthropes to fund the blossoming environmental movement.

These forces were also behind the coup d'état in America which put the Trilateral Commission in power under Jimmy Carter and unleashed the "controlled disintegration of the US economy" from 1978-1982 (this will be the topic of another study).

This grouping, led by Zbigniew Brzezinski, not only played the radical Islam card against the Soviet Union, but also established a program of population reduction through the promotion of green energy sources long before it was popular.

The oligarchs that are currently trying to reform humanity today don't care about the environment. Prince Philip and Bernhardt have been recorded to have killed more endangered species on safari than most people have killed mosquitos. They just don't like people.

Especially thinking people. Thinking people who question how and why arbitrary rules are applied to justify wars, poverty and oligarchism which destroys lives both now and in the future.

The Belt and Road Initiative, and the tendency to grow the human population both quantitatively and qualitatively which such great projects entail, is the target of the Green New Deal.

The legacy of scientific and technological progress that launched western civilization out of a dark age and into a renaissance in the 15th century is under attack because it is that lost ethic which the oligarchy KNOWS may yet be awoken and which would bring the west into harmony with the Russia-China program for growth and development under a philosophy of "win-win cooperation" both on Earth and also in space.

The effects of the ideas of the renaissance coincided with the greatest rate of discoveries of universal principles as mankind sought to come to know the mind of god by studying the book of nature with a heart of love and attitude of humility exemplified in the figure of Leonardo Da Vinci.

The explosion of new technologies that arose not only revolutionized astronomy, medicine and engineering but gave birth to the modern industrial economy which coincided with the greatest rise of population in history.

This exponential rise has been used by Malthusians for centuries as the proof that mankind is "just another cancerous growth" on the "purity of mother Gaia".

So if you don't agree with humans=cancer philosophy, and want something a bit more optimistic in your life, then support a real New Deal today.

  • 9 comments
    last comments from Off Guardian
    John the First 13 Nov 2021 | 6:30 am

    In reply to wardropper.

    Illuminati theory is a product of the theories of a select amount of democratic people who are ever hostile to any elite and anything which is superior to the collective mediocrity which rules in a democracy (while the mediocrities in turn are implicitly ruled by the contemporary intelligent but malevolent oligarchy.
    This is the source of New Name's Illuminati theory. A sensational theory, proposed by the few, adopted by many, parrotted around by more and more, which feeds paranoia and directs hostility. It's a poison seed, which, when mixed with the believers own paranoia, incompetence, inability, smallness, anger and hate, grows into a strong pleasant powerful kick.
    No way you are going to convince a man who feeds on that and so easily accuses the man in question (Beethoven) with the arguments you give, not with any arguments.

    John the First 13 Nov 2021 | 6:10 am

    In reply to New Name.

    That people love to be in areas with lots of green nature, that it is healthy for people is nothing to them. Like the article suggests, they want to imprint a guilt complex on the minds of people (which works best starting with the youngest). It is a modern form of the Christian sinner and guilt complex which they implanted successfully long ago, but which does not work anymore. When they have locked as many as people in cities and suburbs, perhaps they will let you in a large park someday, but collectively in guided trips, in big vans (you have to stay inside these), that is, if you have earned sufficient points by obedience.
    Meanwhile they will remove ever more green in the cities, if needed for commercial or institutional exploitation and expansion.

    But hey, even for the writer of this article capitalism is the devil…, so this communist style top down control finds many adherents… though their ideas differ on points…

    wardropper 9 Nov 2021 | 5:09 am

    In reply to Annie.

    There's a lot of truth in that.

    It always struck me as amazing how often modern biologists seem to be trying to understand Life by dissecting it and killing it.
    So how does Death teach you Life?

    You might as well try to appreciate the colour 'blue' by staring at red pictures all day…

    wardropper 9 Nov 2021 | 4:58 am

    In reply to Howard.

    Well said, Howard.

    Today, the talents of a Mozart, Beethoven, Raphael or Shakespeare would be doomed to waste, and the owners of those talents forced to clean windows in order to survive, because they simply aren't bright enough to grasp the incredible importance of being a crass materialist and trying to fit into a brain-dead, mechanized society.

    wardropper 9 Nov 2021 | 4:33 am

    In reply to New Nane.

    That doesn't apply to the great composers.
    Their music is still loved internationally, centuries after the world in which it was composed has disappeared.

    I have worked with many musicians from other countries, some of whom spoke no English, but the music spoke to us all and effortlessly overcame such barriers.
    Music is a real language, and one much less vulnerable to corruption than traditional languages, because it can't exist without its inner structure and logic.

    It is certainly sad that there are so many people who can't be bothered to learn about 'inner structure and logic', and therefore allow themselves to think that "music is of very little real value."

    Nihilism is usually incurable, depending on how early it was introduced into the host body, but we can't waste time hindering our own progress by wondering what our local nihilist will say next…

    wardropper 9 Nov 2021 | 4:14 am

    In reply to New Name.

    Ludwig van Beethoven had the humiliating experience of having to admit in public that he invented the 'van' bit to appear to be of the nobility and thereby enhance his career when he was younger.

    He knew his gifts were exceptional, but he was not arrogant with regard to his fellow man.
    When he realized in his early thirties that he was well on the way to becoming totally deaf, he was near to suicide because of what he saw as the cruellest thing a composer could suffer.

    He asked, "Can you imagine what it is like for a musician celebrated all over the world, and who is full of goodwill towards his fellow human beings, to have to yell at people in public, "You'll have to shout at me because I am DEAF! ???" "

    If he was a mason, it was because people of his standing often followed that path. Many composers did so. But it is clear from his many surviving letters that the only things he was interested in manipulating were his hands as he played the piano until he could no longer hear it, and his pen when he scrawled those incredible notes on paper.

    "Illuminati" is a word better reserved for the unremarkable and talentless snobs who think money and power are the only things of any significance in the world.
    Nothing could be further from Beethoven's soul than such an abominable outlook, and he even conquered his horrible handicap by composing some of his greatest music during the 25 or so years left to him after deafness struck him so hard.
    Many people wonder how that could be possible, but of course his brilliant career as a performer and composer until his early thirties had given him a rich store of memories upon which the inner ear of his soul was able, and determined, to work further, until he had no more to say.

    It took unbelievable courage for him to pull himself out of the deepest depression and to continue to compose until death claimed him in 1827.
    He also did it for us, admitting that it was only the art of music which pulled him back from falling into the abyss of despair.

    Give him a break. "Illuminati" is an insult to a great man, whose 250th birthday was widely celebrated last year – as well as this year – due to performances being postponed or cancelled because of covid…

    Eman 9 Nov 2021 | 12:22 am

    In reply to New Nane.

    That study was a Greenpeace piece of garbage by some fringe whale biologist in Russia, known there as a crackpot, with zero qualifications in the relevant field. Funny Greenpeace refuses to tell us where they get their $350M/yr from.

    Many people stayed after Chernobyl. Other Reactors continued to be manned and operated until 2000, 18yrs later. The people who stayed were more healthy than those who evacuated. Watch bionerd, a radiation biologist, as she wanders around Chernobyl nuclear plant area, including Greenpeace's much hyped "Red Forest", eating Greenpeace's daunted "radioactive apples" and then visits a naturally radioactive beach resort in Guarapari, Brazil for 3 days. Search for her (bionerd23) Youtube videos:

    " brazil 2012: sunbathing on radioactive beaches "

    " Chernobyl wild zone: radioactive rabies, autumn fruit and foxes "

    End result after 2 days at Chernobyl doing the worst of the worst: she got a 100 uSv dosage, after 2.5 days at Brazil beach she got a 300 uSv dosage. She admits if she had the time to lay on the beach like a typical tourist she would have got about a 900 uSv dosage. At Chernobyl you are getting primarily a gamma & beta radiation external dosage. On the beach you are getting a stronger dosage of both PLUS an internal Alpha particle dosage from breathing and ingestion of Thorium daughters, i.e. Radon, (similar but more potent than plutonium). People have lived on that beach for thousands of years, no detectable bad effect on their health. 

    Victor G. 8 Nov 2021 | 8:18 pm

    In reply to Howard.

    The Empire of Lies

    Victor G. 8 Nov 2021 | 8:17 pm

    In reply to Eman.

    What's that that they're winning … ?

  • write comment
Text to Speech by: ResponsiveVoice-NonCommercial licensed under 95x15
website no use cookies, no spying, no tracking
to use the website, we check:
country: PL · city: · ip: 3.227.240.72
device: computer · browser: CCBot 2 · platform:
counter: 1 · online: 666
created and powered by:
www.RobiYogi.com - Professional Responsive Websites
00:00
00:00
 please wait loading data...