The FDA cover-up that led to the approval of the Pfizer vaccine

by Jon Rappoport on Jon Rappoport

This material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes.
The views expressed are solely those of the authors or commentators and may or may not reflect those of canal666.

As I've been documenting for the past year, the COVID experts have been contradicting themselves six ways from Sunday. As charlatans, they're abject failures. They can't keep their own story straight.

Thanks to an alert reader, I've come across a new blockbuster.

BY THEIR OWN STANDARDS, the FDA should never have allowed the Pfizer COVID vaccine to be shot into a single arm. The Agency's Emergency Use Authorization was a crime-according to their own data.

Here we go.

The document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, "Vaccines and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine." (1)

It is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.

A key quote is buried on page 42: "Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot]."

Those shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.

The comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50% more effective than no vaccine at all-the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization.

To make all this clear, I need to back up and explain the theory of the vaccine clinical trial.

The researchers assumed the SARS-CoV-2 virus was spreading everywhere in the world, and during the clinical trial, it would descend on some volunteers.

The billion-dollar question was: how many people receiving the vaccine would become infected, vs. how many people in the placebo group?

If it turned out that FAR FEWER people getting the vaccine became infected with SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine would be hailed as a success. It protected people against the virus.

But as you can see from the numbers above, that wasn't the case at all.

So now we come to the vital weasel-phrase in the FDA document I just quoted: "suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 [cases]."

"Well, you see, we can't say these were ACTUAL COVID-19 cases. Maybe they were, maybe they weren't. They're in limbo. We want to keep them in limbo. Otherwise, our clinical trial is dead in the water, and we'll never get approval for the vaccine."

What does "suspected cases" mean? It can only mean these people all displayed symptoms consistent with the definition of COVID-19, but they're unconfirmed cases because…their PCR tests were negative, not positive.

However, if their tests were negative, why would they be called "suspected cases" instead of "NOT CASES"?

Something is wrong here. The FDA is hedging its bets, muddying the waters, obscuring facts.

By FDA/CDC rules, a case of COVID-19 means: a person has tested positive, period.

That's the way cases are counted.

These several thousand volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial were either COVID-19 cases or they weren't. Which is it?

The official response to that question is obvious: the FDA decided to throw the data from all those suspected cases in the garbage and ignore them. Poof. Gone.

Why do I say that?

Because if the FDA had paid serious attention to the several thousand "suspected cases," they never would have authorized the vaccine for public use. They would have stopped the clinical trial and undertaken a very deep and extensive investigation.

Which they didn't.

This is called a crime.

"But…but it's not that simple. This is a complex situation. It's a gray area."

"No. It isn't. If you were running a clinical trial of a new drug, and a few thousand people in the trial, who were given the drug, nevertheless came down with the disease symptoms the drug was supposed to cure, wouldn't you cancel the trial and go back to the drawing board?"

"You mean if we were being honest? That's a joke, right? We're not honest. Don't you get it?"

Yes. I get it. You're criminals. Killers.

But wait. There's more. The FDA document also states: "Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group."

That's explosive. Right after vaccination, 409 people who received the shots became "suspected COVID cases." This alone should have been enough to stop the clinical trial altogether. But it wasn't.

In fact, the FDA document tries to excuse those 409 cases with a slippery comment: "It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19."

Translation: You see, a number of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 and adverse effects from the vaccine are the same. Therefore, we have no idea whether the vaccinated people developed COVID or were just reacting to the vaccine. So we're going to ignore this whole mess and pretend it's of no importance.

Back in April of 2020, I predicted the vaccine manufacturers would use this strategy to explain away COVID cases occurring in the vaccine groups of their clinical trials.

It's called cooking the data. It's a way of writing off and ignoring COVID symptoms in the vaccine group-and instead saying, "The vaccine is safe and effective."

And the FDA document, as I stated above, just puts an impenetrable cloud over all the volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial by inventing a category called "suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases," and throwing those crucial data away, never to be spoken of again.

I'm speaking about them now. Any sensible person, looking at them, would conclude that the vaccine should never have been authorized.

Unless fraud, deception, profits, and destruction of human life via the vaccine were and are the true goals.

Finally: When you have "suspected cases," and their ultimate status depends on doing a test, you do the test. You do it as many times as you need to, until it registers positive or negative. Then each "suspected case" becomes an actual case or no case at all.

Perhaps these "suspected cases" in the clinical trial were tested, and many of them came up positive, revealing they were actual COVID cases-but the researchers lied and covered up the fact that they were tested.

Or if you really don't want to know whether "suspected cases" are actual cases, you don't test them. You leave them in a convenient limbo and park them, never to be seen again.

Either way, the situation is patently absurd. By official standards, the PCR test decides whether a person is a case or not a case. Just do the test. Saying "we don't know" is nothing more than a con and a hustle.

I'd love to hear the researchers try to talk their way out of this one. Here is how the conversation might go:

"So you're saying these several thousand suspected COVID cases couldn't be adjudicated one way or another?"

"That's right. Their PCR tests were 'indeterminate'."

"That says something devastating about the test itself."

"Well, sometimes you just can't tell whether it's positive or negative."

"I see. And this 'indeterminate' result occurred in SEVERAL THOUSAND suspected cases."

"I guess so, yes."

"You know, you could have done something else with these suspected cases. A different test. You could have taken tissue samples and looked for the virus itself in a more direct way."

"No. That wouldn't work."

"Why not?"

"Because…the actual virus…"

"Because no one has been able to come up with a specimen of the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus."


"So tell me-what does that indicate? I'll tell you what it indicates. You can't prove the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists.

"I have to go. I'm late for a meeting."

"You're late for more than just a meeting. Is it true a person becomes a virologist by cutting out a coupon from the back of a comic book and mailing it to a PO Box in Maryland?'

"Absolutely not. That's outrageous."

"What then?"

"The PO Box is in Virginia."



    last comments from Jon Rappoport
    stephen langley Thu, 27 May 2021 14:16:49 +0000

    Great points. Common sense, i.e. critical thinking, has been, by design, replaced by the absurd proclamations of the expert class. Absurd owing to how utterly wrong they always are. "An 'expert' is someone who is paid to make you feel stupid by explaining something simple in complex terms." Needless to say, if this deified class were to be held responsible for their prevarications there would be much less of it. When we get off our knees and claim our innate intelligence we will no more facilitate their absurdities nor find ourselves accepting their atrocities.

    stephen langley Thu, 27 May 2021 14:13:40 +0000

    "Ages ago I awoke and began playing marbles with the universe. In truth, I have never missed the mark." ~ ???

    stephen langley Thu, 27 May 2021 14:09:19 +0000

    Common sense, i.e. critical thinking, has been, by design, replaced by the absurd proclamations of the expert class. Absurd owing to how utterly wrong they always are. "An 'expert' is someone who is paid to make you feel stupid by explaining something simple in complex terms." Needless to say, if this deified class were to be held responsible for their prevarications there would be much less of it. When we get off our knees and claim our innate intelligence we will no more facilitate their absurdities nor find ourselves accepting their atrocities.

    stephen langley Thu, 27 May 2021 13:44:26 +0000

    "If you are not your own doctor, you are a fool." ~ Hippocrates.

    DL Thu, 27 May 2021 13:18:14 +0000


    So people literally now think 1) viruses, invaders, are flying around in the air 😆 and 2) that this particular coronavirus was released from a lab.

    So much propaganda. It's fear-based.

    Viruses are not contagious, the only way a lab virus would escape a lab is via vaccination. It can fly through the air all it wants… though I'm not sure how it will go far considering viruses have no wings. If viruses were out to kill us, humans would be extinct! So funny, non-living viruses know how to bypass all of our body's defense mechanisms? Really? Seriously? C'mon people…start thinking a bit more about this..

    Regardless, the lab hypothesis is a lie to fearmonger through conspiracy that viruses are contagious…

    Check out a site called from Jeff Green, where I learned how viruses are really made in our own bodies by our cells when our poor little bacteria can't quite do the job of debreding any damage/toxin, etc. The viruses our cells make have our own DNA/RNA so they are not compatible with others peoples' DNA and so not contagious. Viruses are site specific, to wherever the toxin/pollutant/med/drug/vaccine, etc. is causing damage. Coronaviruses, influenza viruses, etc. in the respiratory areas, hepatitis viruses in the liver, polio viruses in the spinal cord, etc. Where ever the toxins are too much and need to be rid of. If the first line of viruses made by the cells isn't quite enough, another is made, ever so slightly different, called a variant, to continue with cleansing us of the toxin. Jeff Green explains it soooo well. I started with his page of articles. He puts so much time into even answering comments/questions! Then I read the 5 newsletters. The interview Alana Fournet does with Jeff-she explains/summarizes his points very well. And the podcast 'Viral Misconceptions' I think covers a lot. It is amazing what our God-given bodies are built to do for us!!! Big Medicine, Big Pharma, Big Gov't, viscou$ cycle of keeping people $ick and in need of med$ and vaccine$.

    CK Thu, 27 May 2021 00:42:01 +0000

    Doshi at the BMJ pointed this out a few months ago.

    Doshi is one of the "good guys" and back in 2005, he showed that the CDC uses computer models and claims the number of annual flu deaths is 36,000 when it's probably only 3,000!

    CK Thu, 27 May 2021 00:36:32 +0000

    Yes, you're absolutely right. Big Science has become EVIL. Something radically changed in Science during the 1980s- it seems like all fields became increasingly corrupt. Much of that is due to DIMINISHING RETURNS- if you can't make real progress, then you have to FAKE it.

    lamberth Wed, 26 May 2021 21:42:31 +0000

    Mik, well said.

    It's all just the same fear-mongering garbage.
    We don't seem to evolve much in that regard.

    Brian James Wed, 26 May 2021 16:05:03 +0000

    May 23, 2019 Truth In Media: Big Pharma's Influence Over The FDA

    Big Pharma, The FDA & Health Propaganda. The first segment of this episode, Big Pharma's Influence Over The FDA, examines how the pharmaceutical industry exerts heavy influence over the FDA as well as the media and the medical community.

    Michael Rackley Wed, 26 May 2021 16:00:28 +0000

    Bill Gates .one of his favourite books. How to lie with statistics

  • write comment
Text to Speech by: ResponsiveVoice-NonCommercial licensed under 95x15
website no use cookies, no spying, no tracking
to use the website, we check:
country: PL · city: · ip:
device: computer · browser: CCBot 2 · platform:
counter: 1 · online: 666
created and powered by: - Professional Responsive Websites
 please wait loading data...