CDC/FDA smoking gun of smoking guns

by Jon Rappoport on Jon Rappoport

This material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes.
The views expressed are solely those of the authors or commentators and may or may not reflect those of canal666.

They confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus; they "contrived" a model by pretending to find what they wanted to find; it's called a self-fulfilling prophecy

This is the con and the crime that drove millions of lives, and economies, into ruin

Quiz: If an agency of the federal government revealed they had no basis for constructing a diagnostic test that was used on millions of people; but the test was the cornerstone of a national lockdown; and the lockdown drove the economy off a cliff; and destroyed millions of lives; however, NOW, that agency says, they DO have a basis for the test; would you buy what they're selling?

If your answer is yes, you're in good company; the company I call Blind, Ignorant, Denialist, Hoaxing Journalists.

The CDC issued a document that bulges with devastating admissions.

The release is titled, "07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing." It begins explosively:

"After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives."

Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of "detecting the virus." The CDC isn't saying that at all.

They're saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they're replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better "reference sample." A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.

CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020-right up to this minute.

In other words, the millions and millions of "COVID cases" based on the PCR test in use are all suspect. Actually, that statement is too generous. Every test result of every PCR test should be thrown out.

To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, "SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data." Here is a killer quote:

"During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources."

Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it's unbelievable, right? And that's the test we've been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up (invented) synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn't have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.

This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, "…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources."

Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus-the virus we didn't have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results. THE PCR TESTS USED CONTRIVED SPECIMENS OF THE VIRUS WE DIDN'T HAVE.

BUT, don't worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.

In other words, they were lying THEN, but they're not lying NOW. They were "contriving," but now they're telling the truth.

If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.

Here, once again, I report virology's version of "we isolated the virus":

They have a soup they make in their labs.

This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus.

This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients, and that starvation could kill the cells.

There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.

Yet the researchers call cell-death "isolation of the virus."

To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, "We assume, without proof, we have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab" equals, "We've separated the virus from all surrounding material."

Virology equals "how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world." Other than that, it's perfect.

    last comments from Jon Rappoport
    Jim S Smith Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:39:34 +0000


    Denying, questioning, cross-examining, or even just doubting it – will become the next "anti-semitism" law(s).

    Jim S Smith Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:37:35 +0000

    Ivermectin is a lot safer than most of what is being offered now.

    It even has a far better safety profile than – aspirin.

    Treating parasites is its main purpose, and most who are "getting cured" by taking Ivermectin – are most likely getting rid of parasites which were causing most of their health problems.

    Jim S Smith Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:35:47 +0000


    Pyrantel Pamoate.

    Jim S Smith Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:34:46 +0000

    I find that a piece of fresh Ginger root does well also.

    Not too hip about a lot of raw Garlic.

    Jim S Smith Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:33:42 +0000

    There is actually quite a bit in exposing the "1918 Spanish Flu" scam.

    The Rockefeller's "health research" organization(s) be the culprit.

    Their Meningococcal serum was found to be causing far more illnesses, especially among the military who were coerced into receiving it.

    Jim S Smith Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:31:08 +0000

    * * a Humans physiology requires RAW FRUIT, and nothing else! * *

    That's bullshit!

    There are certain proteins (and vitamins) which can only be derived from animal products. Do without these, and your health will NEVER reach optimal.


    You so casually lump ALL human bodies in the same category! – Another big mistake!

    We are NOT all biochemically the same! Even when you consider the specific needs for specific blood-types.

    Time to go back to relearning your human physiology – the right way!

    Jim S Smith Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:27:25 +0000

    Always wise to see what the enemy has to say, regardless. – At least you learn what they are thinking.

    Jay Long Sat, 12 Mar 2022 09:50:41 +0000

    I watched video of Dr. Tom Cowan described how some scientists I think were in South Korea they claimed isolated the SARS-CoV2.

    "No one has ever taken a sample directly from a diseased patient and "isolated" it, meaning to "separate it from all other things." Therefore no one can make the claim that what they are looking for, which hasn't been shown to exist, is in the patient and furthermore, no claim can be made that what they haven't shown to exist is the cause of any dis-ease.

    The way virologists claim to find a "virus" is by taking a sample from a diseased patient. They make the assumption that a "virus" is present in the sample without ever verifying this claim. Next they put the sample into a cell culture of monkey kidney cells where they add fetal bovine serum and other genetic material along with various toxins like antibiotics and antimycotics which starve the cells of nutrients. After 5 days the cells start dying and they call that the cytopathic effect, proof a "virus" and falsely call this process "isolation."

    J.Barlow Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:54:03 +0000

    What war?

    Gary Brown Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:35:31 +0000

    March 4, 2022 New Zealand's Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated. Up to 100% of COVID-19 Hospitalisations Are Among the Fully Vaccinated According to Official Data

    Six of the 19 days have seen the fully vaccinated account for 100% of Covid-19 hospitalisations, this is despite approximately 79% of the New Zealand population being considered fully vaccinated.

  • write comment
Text to Speech by: ResponsiveVoice-NonCommercial licensed under 95x15
website no use cookies, no spying, no tracking
to use the website, we check:
country: PL · city: · ip:
device: computer · browser: CCBot 2 · platform:
counter: 1 · online: 666
created and powered by: - Professional Responsive Websites
 please wait loading data...