CDC/FDA confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus

by Jon Rappoport on Jon Rappoport

This material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes.
The views expressed are solely those of the authors or commentators and may or may not reflect those of canal666.

The CDC has issued a document that bulges with interesting and devastating admissions.

The release is titled, "07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing." [1] It begins explosively:

"After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives."

Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of "detecting the virus." I don't think the CDC is saying that at all.

They're saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they're replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better "reference sample." A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.

CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020-right up to this minute.

In other words, the millions and millions of "COVID cases" based on the PCR test in use are all suspect.

To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, "SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data." [2] [2a] Here is a killer quote:

"During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources."

Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it's unbelievable, right? And that's the test we've been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn't have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.

This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, "…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources."

Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus-the virus we didn't have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results.

BUT, don't worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.

In other words, they were lying THEN, but they're not lying NOW. They were "contriving," but now they're telling the truth.

If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.

Here, once again, I report virology's version of "we isolated the virus": [[3] thru [3i]]

They have a soup they make in their labs.

This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus.

This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients.

There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.

Yet the researchers call cell-death "isolation of the virus."

To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, "We have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab" equals, "We've separated the virus from all surrounding material."

Virology equals "how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world." Other than that, it's perfect.















    last comments from Jon Rappoport
    DJ Wed, 15 Sep 2021 04:23:27 +0000

    How did I know from the beginning " THIS WAS AND IS THE BIGGEST CRIME COMMITTED ON HUMANITY " and it is part of the TAKEOVER THE COUNTRY, and rule Communism. All about POWER, MONEY and fraud, divide/sedition the Americans and DESTROY EVERYTHING THEY CAN. This was preparing since the WWII when our government took in all the massive killers {Doctors, Scientists} who were working for Hitler/he was a communist. Very sick, disgusting BUT TRUE.

    Marivan Sun, 15 Aug 2021 22:25:43 +0000

    I have a new name for the CDC …Center for Disease Crime…

    Alex Mon, 09 Aug 2021 08:30:42 +0000

    Just to back up your article further, have you seen the CDC document [CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel] stating: "no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available" [page 39]. It is here:

    The above line was stated in versions 01-05 [13th July 2020], then the wording was altered from version 06 onward to read:

    "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed
    and this study conducted," [21st July 2020].

    The updated version is of course the only one you can now find on their website, and its now on page 41 instead of 39.

    Geo Martin Tue, 03 Aug 2021 12:30:18 +0000

    Stay above water.

    You know how Peter was walking on water until he doubted and began to sink. So Jesus told him 'you of little faith, why did you doubt?

    You are on the path to the truth, don't let the tricks of the devil's minions pull you back in to darkness.

    USA Invades Israel Tue, 03 Aug 2021 04:37:43 +0000

    Speaking of the FDA, they knew about the potential side effects of Covidian "vaccines";

    But, this should not be a surprise. The nice voiceover man speaking on the TV commercial about the side effects of any number of drugs available to the average pharmaceutical junkie citizen is and has been commonplace for a long time. Why should these gene-slot machine shots NOT have side effects?

    Ron Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:48:25 +0000

    I think you're exactly right!

    Gregory William Sun, 01 Aug 2021 23:48:45 +0000

    After 18 months, the use of the PCR test to detect "SARS-CoV-2" has been officially invalidated. This, because said virus had never been isolated to be able to detect it to begin with, and because the PCR is not suitable to detect a viral load, rather to amplify genetic material present as "noise" in all living beings. Therefore, it is official, until now the pandemic has been a fraud, a PCRdemic.

    Up until now, SARS-CoV-2 attributed deaths have been either provoked, as was the case at the beginning in elderly care facilities in Italy, Spain and New York, or simply due to other pathologies attributed to SARS-CoV-2 (for example, in 2020, deaths from influenza inexplicably decreased by 75% ). From now on, thanks to the new antigen test (Mologic / Global Access Health) that detects spike protein molecules, which is supposed to distinguish between influenza and SARS-CoV-2, the PCRdemic will mutate into a spikeprotiendemic, resulting from the "vaccines" and shedd by "vaccinated" people.

    Marilyn Shepherd Sun, 01 Aug 2021 20:45:12 +0000

    Maybe the treatments worked because the people were never actually sick

    Marilyn Shepherd Sun, 01 Aug 2021 20:44:23 +0000

    In October last year the Indian government switched to rapid testing at a time when nothing much was happening, these tests are even more useless than the PCR, and show up vast numbers of false positives, the more you do the more "cases'. Then add in the mix of 40 degree temperatures, 80% humidity and hazardous pollution levels for a month in Delhi, and you have Delta

    Marilyn Shepherd Sun, 01 Aug 2021 20:41:36 +0000

    As a teenager nursing in a country hospital in 1972 we had a ritual, all people who were fit enough were taken to the garden for some sunshine on fine days and on rainy days were in the sun room – none of even the oldest people in the place were ever vitamin D deficient, locking them all in without sun or fresh air and pumping them with drugs was genocide and it makes me sick to my stomach

  • write comment
Text to Speech by: ResponsiveVoice-NonCommercial licensed under 95x15
website no use cookies, no spying, no tracking
to use the website, we check:
country: PL · city: · ip:
device: computer · browser: CCBot 2 · platform:
counter: 1 · online: 666
created and powered by: - Professional Responsive Websites
 please wait loading data...