Bill Gates vs. freedom

by Jon Rappoport on Jon Rappoport

This material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes.
The views expressed are solely those of the authors or commentators and may or may not reflect those of canal666.

"Under the surface of this global civilization, a great and secret war is taking place. The two opponents hold different conceptions of Reality. On one side, those who claim that humans operate purely on the basis of stimulus-response, like machines; on the other side, those who believe there is a gigantic thing called freedom. Phase One of the war is already over. The stimulus-response people have won. In Phase Two, people are waking up to the far-reaching and devastating consequences of the Pavlovian program." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

"From the moment the first leader of the first clan in human history took charge, he busied himself with this question: 'What can I say and do that will make my people react the way I want them to.' He was the first Pavlov. He was the first psychologist, the first propagandist, the first mind-control boss. His was the first little empire. Since then, only the means and methods have changed." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

A thought-form is a picture-plus concept in the mind that tends to guide behavior.

A dominant thought-form in Earth civilization today is: universal rule through gigantic, highly organized structures; e.g., mega-corporations that owe no allegiance to any nation.

Imagine a few thousand such corporations with interlocking boards and directorates; colluding with super-regional governments and their honeycombed bureaucracies; combined with regional armies, intelligence agencies and technological elites; hooked to a global surveillance operation; in control of media; cooperating with the largest organized religions on Earth.

Imagine all this as essentially one organization - and you see the thought-form in its wide-screen version.

Top-down as top-down has never been before.

Functions and compartments defined and specialized at every level, and coordinated in order to carry out policy decisions.

As to why such a thought-form should come to dominate human affairs, the simplest explanation is: because it works.

But beneath that answer, for those who can see, there is much, much more.

Individuals come to think that "effective" and "instrumental" and "efficient" are more important than any other issues.

Keep building, keep expanding, keep consolidating gains - and above all else, keep organizing.

Such notions and thought-forms replace life itself.

The Machine has come to the fore. All questions are now about how the individual sees himself fitting into the structure and function of The Machine.

Are human beings becoming social constructs?

Populations are undergoing a quiet revolution. We can cite some of the reasons: television; education; job training and employment requirements; the Surveillance State; government organizations who follow a "zero tolerance" policy; inundation with advertising.

Yes, it’s all geared to produce people who are artificial constructs.

And this is just the beginning. There are a number of companies (see, for example, who are dedicated to measuring "audience response" to ads and other public messages. I’m talking about electronic measuring. The use of bracelets, for instance, that record students’ emotional responses to teachers in classrooms, in real time. (Bill Gates shoveled grant money into several of these studies.)

Then there is facial recognition geared to the task of revealing how people are reacting when they sit at their computers.

Push-pull, ring the bell, watch the dog drool for his food. Stimulus-response.

It’s not much of a stretch to envision, up the road a few years, whole populations more than willing to volunteer for this kind of mass experimentation. But further than that, we could see society itself embrace, culturally, the ongoing measurement of stimuli and responses.

"Yes, I want to live like this. I want to be inside the system. I want to be analyzed. I want to be evaluated. I want to accept the results. I want to be part of the new culture. Put bracelets on me. Measure my eye movements, my throat twitches that indicate what I’m thinking, and my brain waves. Going to a movie should include the experience of wearing electrodes that record my second-to-second reactions to what’s happening on the screen. I like that. I look forward to it..."

In such a culture, "Surveillance State" would take on a whole new dimension.

"Sir, I want to report a malfunction in my television set. I notice the monitoring equipment that tracks my responses to programs has gone on the blink. I want it reattached as soon as possible. Can you fix it remotely, or do you need to send a repair person out to the house? I’ll be here all day..."

People will take pride in their ongoing role as social constructs, just as they now take pride in owning a quality brand of car.

The thought process behind this, in so far as any thought at all takes place, goes something like: "If I’m really a bundle of responses to stimuli and nothing more, then I want to be inside a system that champions that fact and records it... I don’t want to be left out in the cold."

Here is a sample school situation of the near future: for six months, Mr. Jones, the teacher, has been video recorded, moment by moment, as he instructs his class in English. All the students have been wearing electronic bracelets [apple watches], and their real time emotional responses (interest, boredom, aversion) have also been recorded. A team of specialists has analyzed the six months of video, matching it up, second by second, to the students’ responses. The teacher is called in for a conference.

"Mr. Jones, we now know what you’re doing that works and what you’re doing that doesn’t work. We know exactly what students are positively reacting to, and what bores them. Therefore, we’re going to put you into a re-ed seminar, where you’ll learn precisely how to teach your classes from now on, to maximize your effectiveness. We’ll show you how to move your hands, what tone of voice to use, how to stand, when to make eye contact, and so on..."

Mr. Jones is now a quacking duck. He will be trained how to quack "for the greater good." He is now a machine toy. Whatever is left of his passion, his intelligence, his free will, his spontaneous insights, his drive to make students actually understand what they’re learning... all subordinated for the sake of supposed efficiency.

Think this is an extreme fantasy? See the Chicago Tribune, June 12, 2012, "Biosensors to monitor students’ attentiveness":

"The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which has poured more than $4 billion into efforts to transform public education in the U.S., is pushing to develop an 'engagement pedometer.' Biometric devices wrapped around the wrists of students would identify which classroom moments excite and interest them - and which fall flat."

"The foundation has given $1.4 million in grants to several university researchers to begin testing the devices in middle-school classrooms this fall [2012]."

"The biometric bracelets, produced by a Massachusetts startup company, Affectiva Inc, send a small current across the skin and then measure subtle changes in electrical charges as the sympathetic nervous system responds to stimuli. The wireless devices have been used in pilot tests to gauge consumers' emotional response to advertising."

"Gates officials hope the devices, known as Q Sensors, can become a common classroom tool, enabling teachers to see, in real time, which kids are tuned in and which are zoned out."

"Existing measures of student engagement, such as videotaping classes for expert review or simply asking kids what they liked in a lesson, 'only get us so far,' said Debbie Robinson, a spokeswoman for the Gates Foundation. To truly improve teaching and learning, she said, 'we need universal, valid, reliable and practical instruments' such as the biosensors."

"The Gates Foundation has spent two years videotaping 20,000 classroom lessons and breaking them down, minute by minute, to analyze how each teacher presents material and how those techniques affect student test scores."

"Clemson received about $500,000 in Gates funding. Another $620,000 will support an MIT scientist, John Gabrieli, who aims to develop a scale to measure degrees of student engagement by comparing biosensor data to functional MRI brain scans (!) (using college students as subjects)."

When you boil it down, the world-view represented here has nothing to do with "caring about students." It has everything to do with the Pavlovian view of humans as biological machines.

What input yields what response? How can people be shaped into predictable constructs?

As far as Gates is concerned, the underlying theme, as always, is: control.

In this new world, the process of thinking and comparing and independently judging, and the freedom to make individual choices... well, for whatever that was worth, we can’t encourage it for a whole society. It’s too unpredictable. We don’t have time for that sort of thing. No, we have to achieve reduction. We have to seek out lowest common denominators.

This is what universal surveillance is all about; the observation of those denominators and the variances from them - the outlying and therefore dangerous departures from the norm.

"Well, we’ve tracked Mr. Jones’ classroom for a year now, and we’ve collated all the measurements of reactions from the students. It was a wonderful study. But we did notice one thing. All the students showed similar patterns of reactions over time... except two students. We couldn’t fit them into the algorithms. They seemed to be responding oppositely. It was almost as if they were intentionally defecting from the group. This signals some kind of disorder. We need a name for it. Is it Oppositional Defiance Disorder, or is it new? We recommend attaching electrodes to those two students’ skulls, so we can get a better readout of their brain activity in real time."

You see, everything must be analyzed on the basis of stimulus response. Those two students are suffering from a brain problem. They must be. Because if they aren’t, if they have the ability to choose and decide how to respond, then they have free will, and that can’t be measured. Much deeper, that also suggests an X-factor in humans, wherein the flow of chemicals and atoms and quarks and mesons and photons don’t tell the whole story. The rest of the story would imply the existence of something that is... non-material ...above and beyond push-pull cause and effect.

The gatekeepers of this world are obsessed with ruling that out. They guard Reality itself, which is to say, their conception of Reality. They are willing to spend untold amounts of money to make that Pavlovian conception universally accepted and universally loved.

Because they own that conception. They are the self-appointed title holders. They are the kings of that domain.

I feel obligated to inform them that their domain is much, much smaller than they think it is. And in the fullness of time, which is very long, the domain is going to fall and crack and collapse and disintegrate. And all their horses and all their men won’t be able to put it back together.

Eventually, a man like Bill Gates will be forgotten. He’ll be a small footnote on a dusty page in a crumbling book in a dark room on a remote island.

A morbid venal fool who chased, for a brief moment, fool’s gold.

There is an irreducible thing. It’s called freedom. It is native to every individual.

Sometimes it rears its head in the middle of the night, and the dreamer awakes.

And he asks himself: what is my freedom for?

And then he begins a voyage that no device can record, measure, or analyze.

If he pursues it long enough, it takes him out of the labyrinth.

Pavlov wrote: "Mankind will possess incalculable advantages and extraordinary control over human behavior when the scientific investigator will be able to subject his fellow men to the same external analysis he would employ for any natural object..."

Basically, Pavlov was promoting the idea that whatever an individual perceives and feels about his own experience is a confused mess and an obstruction.

Rather, the individual should ignore all that tripe, and instead, allow himself to be a "natural object," see himself as a clean and simple response mechanism, as planned inputs cause him to behave in various ways.

In other words, then he will have no life.

Bill Gates and other elite planners are working toward this end.

When Ray Kurzweil talks about hooking brains up to super-computers, he is envisioning a process of downloading that goes beyond choice. Somehow, automatically, the brain and the individual (he apparently believes they are the same thing) will receive inputs that translate into knowledge and even talent. This is another fatuous version of Pavlov.

In Brave New World, Huxley wrote: "Hot tunnels alternated with cool tunnels. Coolness was wedded to discomfort in the form of hard X-rays. By the time they were decanted the embryos had a horror of cold. They were predestined to emigrate to the tropics, to be miners and acetate silk spinners and steel workers. Later on their minds would be made to endorse the judgment of their bodies. 'We condition them to thrive on heat', concluded Mr. Foster. 'Our colleagues upstairs will teach them to love it'."


If researchers developed this technology, who could doubt that elite planners would push it forward? It would be the culmination of their dream.

The freedom of the individual, his innate capacity to make wide-ranging choices, is the monkey wrench in the program. It is anti-stimulus-response.

This is why you would have to search far and wide to find, in one school, anywhere, on any level, a course that examines and promotes individual freedom.

It is anathema to the plan.

It is the silver bullet for the vampire.

Freedom comes from Within the individual, not from Without.

On the level of political control, freedom emerged and broke through during centuries of struggle.

Now, and in the future, every individual carries that torch.

So it is incumbent on the individual to understand the scope and meaning and power of his own freedom, and to decide for himself what his freedom is FOR.

What will he choose to launch from that great space?

    last comments from Jon Rappoport
    Peter Meissnitzer (Gladiatoro) Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:09:16 +0000

    Bill Gates will be forgotten alright another globalist lunatic , when all the layers are peeled back all vaccine research goes back to one man Bill Gates , in the end vaccines are about one thing only population control , nothing more nothing less. Let's call it a SOFT KILL , Microsoft lol… get it .

    Michael Burns Thu, 27 Sep 2018 18:38:27 +0000

    Hey cowboy how are you? Do you have any snow yet, up there where you live? Been snowing the last couple of weeks here, the ice age is upon us — or at the least a Maunder Minimum, all the facts are not in yet.

    World food crops are crashing. The only ones who seem to be gaining are the Russians. Wheat is in short supply except for them. Of course Monsanto is outlawed in Russia. I hope you are learning to grow food. Have you learned how to grow sprouts and microgreens yet? Don't be a slacker, you have a long life ahead. But I digress…

    Yes it is interesting how these slimy reptiles fund their bullshit. As the panopticon becomes more apparent, more visual and in your face. More intricate and finely tuned in its oppressive nature. NGO's and their true purpose is becoming understood to a greater populace. They are not in the charity business.

    The old 501(c)(3) — which is in itself a corporation. And of which,

    …is starting do its work on the outsiders, the unbelievers, the part of the flock that is beginning to wonder, and wander. And all the sleepy awakening ones. They aim to get them early and shock them back into the trance.

    Originally, 501's were intended as a charitable organization, are now finds greater value in becoming — how should I say…a weaponized tech instrument of a finer brainwashing, and the tattle-tale for the greater ministry of truth: Google and its owners the CIA.

    Have you looked at the staffing at DataSociety, of this ever-widening spider's web of organizations. They are filled to the brim with psychologist specialists and information specialists, analysts, sociologists and marketers and mind-fuckers, and especially the afternoon tea type spooks. This is definitely the modern equivalent of the CIA's 'Operation Mockingbird'.

    The gas lighting that will go on will be intolerable as they, genuflect and obey and send out their AI, their manipulated algorithms to electronically persecute what 'THEY' consider to be fake, alternate facts (sic) and what they believe is plain old mis/disinformation and the rising white extremism.

    The noose is tightening, with the advent of a "link tax", truth is being silenced online, Honest Liberty. Many who speak the truth are moving to the intellectual dark web. 

    Gates and Soros have dumped a huge amount of money at this, and money seems to be the catalyst —  they surely have enough of it — young online entrepreneurs are stymied by demonitization, censorship and having to beg for donations to their information websites. Open Data aim to do on the next election what they have accused the Russians of doing, with the election of Donald Trump. You can be guarenteed of that…

    I wish I had billions… I would drown these NGO's organizations in truth, law suite, counter measure and I would fund a vast army from the intellectual dark web to troll every one of them. To pester them into insanity for their evil tasks.
    5g and the internet of things will make DataSociety more efficient. 

    Tony Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:59:37 +0000

    Disturbing insight from China where they're making progress in hooking up the biological machine to the machine of behaviour modification:

    —"The Communist Party's plan is for every one of its 1.4 billion citizens to be at the whim of a dystopian social credit system, and it's on track to be fully operational by the year 2020 […] Under the social credit scheme, points are lost and gained based on readings from a sophisticated network of 200 million surveillance cameras — a figure set to triple in 18 months. The program has been enabled by rapid advances in facial recognition, body scanning and geo-tracking.

    maidinamerica Thu, 27 Sep 2018 05:32:46 +0000

    As we speak the Global Vaccine Quality Control Laboratories Network is meeting, Rome, Sept. 25-27, 2018. An open letter will be addressed to The WHO, and those attending the Global Vaccine Quality Control Laboratories Network and to the European Parliament, the European Medicines Agency and the European Directorate for the quality of Medicines. There are 119 signatories, beginning with Robert Kennedy, Jr, 41 names representing health and vaccine organizations from the US (21states), and the remainder include names and organizations around the world.
    They make many requests in this letter, emphasizing the lack of proving vaccine safety due to shortcuts, studies cut short before adverse events, post marketing surveillance, no true placebos used, and many conflicts of interest. The icing on the cake includes the mentioning of the high criminal eugenicist, and the highly questionable funding of The WHO, that relies on funding of private donations, such as GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccine and Immunization) which Gates is huge part of along with World Bank.This letter calls into question the funding of the private Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which has an inherent conflict of interest, again requesting for independent studies with a guarantee of safety and liability by The WHO. The footnote to this information states that this foundation is one of the 5 biggest investors in the world. As of Aug 2018 the foundation had (drumroll) 22,114 million $ in stocks according to guru

    Other news includes that this fraudster has purchased the Cochrane Collaboration for a mere $1.15 million. (The Death of Scientific Inquiry) This is chilling. This site is one that many use who were looking for true vaccine studies, data that hasn't been scrubbed and using real placebos. ( Such as Dr. Suzanne Humphries). Dr. Peter Gotzsche has recently been fired and has in the past been a huge critic of big pHARMa. The capper now is one of the sickest low-lifes in the world will have this organization now support the "next generation evidence system", focusing on "maternal and child health". (translated deaths).

    honestliberty Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:26:30 +0000

    and look at the funding… says it all

    Bill Gates
    Open Society Foundation (Soros)
    UN Global pulse
    The Ethics and Governance of AI Initiative

    I'm sure a bunch of these other funders (contributors and message massagers) have similar anti-human philosophies.

    talk about a hit piece by the way. alternative influence?! There wasn't nary a morsel of fact, just neo-marxist horse hockey smug opinionation. Stefan Molyneux and James Corbett shredded that sack of filth hit piece.

    Greg Simay Wed, 26 Sep 2018 06:16:07 +0000

    The scifi series Continuum is coming true.

    Ozzie Thinker Wed, 26 Sep 2018 04:56:41 +0000


    Excellent article that resounding contains the issue.

    However, I would like to add to your opening statements.

    Nietzsche was right. Pavlov and other genre academics had evolved religion so thoroughly, God ceased to be necessary or "valid".

    Here's a recent Facebook entry of mine which will hopefully resonate:

    "In the very beginning God created everything known and unknown. That is because all existence and non-existence combines as one. The summary of the parts are God. Much later a puny though mildly strategic entity chose the form commonly known as human or man. One of man's first acts of revolt was to recreate god in His image. His determination and lust for control was such that everything had to serve to His tyranny. Many minorities found they could not comply, so each rebranded the original concept to suit their own lust for power. These concepts ultimately grew to become the various corporate (body speaks) religions that torture modern populations."


    Michael Burns Wed, 26 Sep 2018 02:55:07 +0000

    A new think tank to common core the adults in the room. I have barely scratched the surface of this and it appearing to be a leviathon — it is such a connected network.
    These braindead little tea cups have a new network.

    From Quebec Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:02:20 +0000

    Nah Jon, it is worse than that. They want to kill us all and replace us with robots.

    Ron Hollis Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:47:25 +0000

    Just like "1984" on steroids.

  • write comment
Text to Speech by: ResponsiveVoice-NonCommercial licensed under 95x15
website no use cookies, no spying, no tracking
to use the website, we check:
country: PL · city: · ip:
device: computer · browser: CCBot 2 · platform:
counter: 1 · online: 666
created and powered by: - Professional Responsive Websites
 please wait loading data...