Who's destroying England and Western Europe?
Ten materiał jest rozpowszechniany bez zysku w celach badawczych i edukacyjnych.
Wyrażone poglądy są wyłącznie poglądami autorów lub komentatorów i mogą, ale nie muszą, odzwierciedlać poglądów canal666.
In the run-up to the Brexit vote in 2016, immigration came to the fore as the key issue. But of course, the European Union has a policy of opening borders of all member countries.
The EU wants one continent, no separate countries—and the way to achieve that is by creating a massive flood of migrants. Destroy traditions and cultures that define countries. In the process, accept terrorism as "inevitable". Don't talk or write about the actual effects of immigration. That would be "hate speech". Keep eyes and mouth shut, and march straight ahead into a future of one European continent ruled from above by the EU.
Ever since the UK vote to leave the unelected, terminally corrupt, and rotting edifice known as the European Union, stall tactics and threats have been launched at Brits.
First it was, "It's going to take a long time to untangle the UK from the EU, it's very complicated". Actually, that tactic was predated by Prince Obama traveling to England to warn the population they'd stand at the back of the line in forming separate trade deals with the US, if they left the EU. It's called interfering in the political affairs of another nation. Now it's the EU and Queen Merkel beating the UK to the punch by plotting trade deals with India and China, in order to leave the British out in the cold.
But the basic question is, Is Britain a nation? Does it exist? It's a question citizens are supposed to answer. Not Merkel, Obama, or the EU.
This issue, in case it's unclear, is all about Globalism. According to that totalitarian political philosophy, of which the EU is a standard bearer, there are no nations. There are only mega-corporations and banks.
As the departed guru of the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski, wrote in 1969, "(The) nation state as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state".
This is not only a political and economic statement, it's a prescriptive piece of psychological advice: Stop thinking of yourself as a citizen of a country; you're a global citizen; you exist and function at the pleasure of a new collaborative international order.
And the new order will triumph. Bow your heads and accept it.
Unless people get up on their hind legs and say no, which is what happened in the 2016 Brexit vote.
Defection. Decentralization. Independence.
Hideous words to the ears of Globalists.
Their basic strategy, since the end of World War 2, has been to spin a highly complex network of political and economic relationships, from one end of the world to the other—a labyrinth—from which escape is seen as virtually impossible.
Trade deals like USMCA, NAFTA, CAFTA, and GATT are only part of this system. The EU itself keeps churning out thousands of rules, regulations, and laws.
Build the maze; put national governments and populations in the maze.
Then more or less claim the planet would collapse without the maze.
Last year, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker issued a "maze statement" to President Trump after Trump rejected the Globalist Paris Climate (non-) Treaty: "Europe's duty is to say: it's not like that. The Americans can't just leave the climate protection agreement. Mr. Trump believes that [he can] because he doesn't know the details…We tried to explain that to Mr. Trump [at the G7 Summit] in Taormina [Sicily, Italy] in clear German sentences. It seems that our attempt failed, but the law is the law, and it must be obeyed. Not everything which is law and not everything in international agreements is fake news, and we have to comply with it."
Supremely arrogant, Juncker was winging it and writing his own script, because, in fact, the US didn't sign on to a treaty in Paris. Obama tried to unilaterally bind the US to the climate pact, when a two-third's vote by the US Senate is actually required for such international agreements. And no Senate vote was taken.
But this is the EU's preemptive attitude toward defection, decentralization, and independence.
In the case of Brexit, climate change wasn't the issue. Immigration was. The EU tried its best to chastise England for daring to insist unlimited numbers of migrants might be too many. "You're in the maze, stay in the maze."
And there is another vector of attack being launched at England: reminders the nation is evil for its colonial practices, which can never, ever be erased. But the covert leaders in that propaganda effort, the EU and its Globalist bosses, feel entitled in their own attempt to colonize the whole planet. "Your colonizing was bad, ours is good."
With an annual budget in the vicinity of $100 billion, the EU is intractably corrupt and incompetent. It's estimated that $5 billion a year is stolen from that budget. As for the other $95 billion, what is it for? Nations can govern themselves. The EU could disappear tomorrow and no one would catch a cold. The entire bloated structure, employing between 30 and 50 thousand people (depending on how far the count is extended) is a vast boondoggle.
It's astonishing that anyone in the UK would feel a sense of loyalty to the EU.
There is nothing strange about Brexit at all. It's a natural reaction: One day, a house pet goes outside and wanders off into the woods and never comes back. Who is really surprised?
The "system" called the EU insists that terrorism is somehow a price the British people must pay for entering "a better future for all". Don't ask what that future looks like. Don't think about it. The UK doesn't have the right to set its own immigration policy.
The chaos and destruction that result from open borders are simply an "adjustment period", after which things will settle down. A new and better England and Europe will emerge. Diversity will triumph. How? Don't worry about that, be happy.
You see, diversity is a high-minded principle, and by definition it implies a more humane society. Therefore, there is no counter-evidence. Facts are unimportant.
However, Britain is free to set its own policy.
To do so, politically correct speech will have to be jettisoned. Facts will have to be widely expressed. Lies will have to be widely exposed.
The EU will need to be named as a driving force in immigration, and the results of migration will need to be laid at its door.
The EU sees immigrant terrorism as its ticket to greater control over Europe.
Leaving the EU means LEAVING the EU.
How long before leaving means LEAVING?
How long before the British people realize that the flood of migrants is not simply "a refugee crisis" created by the US and its allies, whose imperialist policies of Empire and wars in the Middle East, Asia, and Africa, initiate "blowback"?
How long before they see numbers of these "refugees" are just military-age young men who arrive with destruction on their minds?
How long before they see England is riddled with EU agents who are "forwarding a humane immigration policy", come hell or high water?
One continent, under no liberty and no justice, with suffering and slavery for all.
How long before they leave THAT?
-
10 komentarzyostatnie komentarze z Jon Rappoport
› Fred Donaldson Wed, 02 Jan 2019 18:03:02 +0000
The European Union budget of #100 billion seems a bit excessive. The same money could provide an annual grant of $20,000 to each resident of Liberia, or we could reduce the amount to $2,000 and offer that every year to each of the 50 million citizens of Kenya. In a few years of spreading the wealth, we would see economic rebirth beyond belief.
› Michael Burns Sun, 30 Dec 2018 13:07:36 +0000
What is your relationship with "the Indepedent" ?
What is your relationship with Prezi?
Are you a Russian that lived in Latvia or Hungary?
Do you run a troll farm in England.
Hungarians have not known freedom, the Soviets made sure of that way back in stone age.
Why did you hack my phone?
Be careful…› Szelleme Diofa Wed, 26 Dec 2018 22:51:09 +0000
I am sorry, I lost my patience to read your comment fully, it's just so … – forgive me to speak freely – you mentioned KGB, Kreml, etc. I failed to see the difference between KGB and CIA, MI6, FBI and so on.
You mentioned Putin's power above media. Just joking? Here when so often discussed that how OUR media lies to us, mislead us for example about vaccines, medicines, how they stage up fake news, eg that 'Ebola documentary' still on YouTube where that guy clearly not dying…and list is endless.
What are you talking about?!
We shouldn't worry about other countries far away, or their leaders, media but our very owns first.
For US that how to stop compulsory vaccination, GM food, etc and sorry.
For us almost the same + the EU problem. So please let's talk about the point, please.› Szelleme Diofa Wed, 26 Dec 2018 22:27:08 +0000
Fearmongering using Putin's name. Always has to be an enemy to force / push / persuade people. Never thought that who is otherwise clever and open minded enough to read Mr. Rappoport's blog can write such nonsense, propaganda. EU is not necessary, but a plague in Europe ruining countries and its people.
I am a Hungarian living in the UK and I would have voted for Brexit if I could (we were not allowed to vote). Because of a simple reason: I've seen what EU and corrupt politicians did to ruin my country , misleading its people. They ruined agriculture with stupid regulations and did the same with Industry to make market for wealthier countries. Result was terrible unemployment and poverty while my country can be a winner focusing on agriculture. This was an example only to show the rotten leadership. Yesterday it happened with my country but tomorrow it can and will happen with UK, too. Why anyone would think that the 'head' what doesn't care about countries, nations but globalist plans would spare the UK or any other one?I wish for leaving the EU, no matter what. Firstly they already made us pay the price in many ways (inflation, fear mongering, etc) and will as long as we are in – to persuade people to vote again to stay. Just like they did with Ireland I think matter was the Lisbon treaty if I recall it well (kindly suggest to Jon to read after it if some 'bullets' would be missing) ????
With a quick and clean Brexit the price probably will be higher but won't last forever especially if other countries would follow, this is the only way to make the EU collapse.Putin is not an evil but a clever politician, maybe not a saint but looks loyal to his people and smart enough to stay out and safe even now when he is under constant attacks of media in UK and US, he is a benefit to his own country. I wish we had some similar for our countries, I would be far more relaxed.
› petergrafstrm Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:48:05 +0000
I have consistently critisised and exposed Britains role behind communism, nazism and zionism. So making me a supporter of any of that is a lie. But like the nationalist russian historian Starikov, I have no interest in joining the constant demonisation of the Soviets. The truth has no agenda although you have a hard time grasping that simple principle.
I recommend Starikovs "The liquidation of Russia, who helped the reds win the civil war?" There you will find how Starikov in no way defends the revolutionaries right to impose their experiment on the Russian people, but he wants to explain what happened unknown to those who trust the official narrative. He details how Lenin manoevered between the various limitations set up by Britain to eventually put bolshevism in power.
And shows how Britains series of deceptions liquidated the white armies.
Very revealing. Unfortunately established western historians keep spreading myths. And many guillible people dont understand that these corrupt court historians get nice book contracts for lying by omission.
Money makes the world go round…› Michael Burns Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:07:06 +0000
Lol..too funny. You keep wandering of the reserve. Your trying to blow smoke, hahahaha
You chekists are all alike, you are like old wind up metal robot toys of the early 60's… wind you up till the blue steel twings, and then let you go. And watch you clang and buzz around the floor in circles. Haha
I have been told that Chekists are one step away from Bolsheviks. Is that true peter?
Maven's on the way, and that should seriously throw a monkey wrench in the whole operation, the whole thing is up grabs. He does not want a reset, many have tried.
He is an abused child of a abused father/master; he knows the power available to him, if he can only hang on a few more years.
And so he practices on a daily basis what he would do to the world.
Now you can go ahead and sow your Anglo-American diatribe and bullshit, but I won't waste my time, while you self destruct chekist. He is not the one, he is not even close, even though he proclaims it.The one thing this SOB does not like, is his own paranoia and he is afraid of it, can't tell the truth from religion — you simply push back hard — he was one of those boys that got a kick out of pulling the wings of flies. You know the type
I see the botox shots have increased, do you think he is feeling the cold hand of mortality. I hear he has a new squeeze..
How old is he now…77?
› petergrafstrm Mon, 17 Dec 2018 22:57:40 +0000
Yes hopefully dangerous for the evil parasites who want to saw division and backwardness for easy looting everywhere. But dangerous only if the bear is attacked or unfairly cornered. Not dangerous in the way the Us/Uk rogue states are dangerous.
› Michael Burns Sun, 16 Dec 2018 23:46:14 +0000
That's right, break the EU down to old Europe, small countries out there by themselves, out from under the red tape and bureacracy, easy pickins for Putin's oligarchs…do you know how many times Putin approached Greece to bail them out — but they only had to allow Russian Navy docking there…have you been paying attention to Yemen, Eritrea…hm.
A stark knee jerk response but no intelligent rhetoric on why? Just the ad hominen, typical troll, or the the response of the Ignorant.
Putin is the most dangerous man on the planet.› Mr Ecks Sun, 16 Dec 2018 00:36:53 +0000
Absolutely false and deceitful remainiac crap. The EU is vastly more dangerous than Putin.
-
napisz komentarz
› 1EarthUnited Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:07:16 +0000
@Michael Burns… uhh brainwashed much? You sir are the perfect mouthpiece for serving the globalist agenda. Nice job regurgitating MSM propaganda, reinforcing Western imperialism and perpetuating your own demise along with the great unwashed sheeple of the world.
Question #1, has Russia or the Soviet Union ever invaded another country, having imperialist aspirations? Has China?
Question #2, has there ever been a time when the collective West, US, EU and their lackey supporters ever been at peace? It's been non stop war with EVERYONE since Roman times. Hell, the US of A was founded by war and has bases nearly all over the world, control world economies, oil thru petro$, Forex fix, and manipulating commodity exchanges.
Whatever nation doesn't go along to get along will experience harsh sanctions and fines. Even face illegal arrest of a sovereign nation's citizen, ie China b/c don't happen to abide by US' corrupt trade policies.
Check out Lada Ray's work, the West is collapsing under it's own karmic weight. It's a great time to wake up and drop the Matrix!