The Vigilant Citizen

1. The Cringy Symbolism in Jojo Siwa’s “Karma”

Jojo Siwa is a classic case of a child star who grew up in the spotlight while manipulated by exploitative adults. At every step of the way, she had to put on a big smile while participating in toxic, cringy projects whose awfulness has yet to be fully exposed. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if a full-length documentary named "The Dark Side of Jojo" gets released in the next few years. Because, seriously, her whole career has been drenched with weirdness and behind-the-scenes rumors since its very start.

Siwa's career began at age 12 as a participant in the reality show Dance Moms. And, looking back, that thing was ridiculous.

The show Dance Moms is summed up in one picture: Abby Lee Miller (accused of being toxic and abusive) angrily points at young Jojo Siwa while wearing an outfit she probably shouldn't be wearing.

While the show was popular with little girls and their mothers, Dance Moms also seemed to cater to another demographic: Vile, disgusting pedophiles.

Several episodes featured controversial costume choices made by Miller. Due to heavy criticism, the season 2 episode "Topless Showgirls", which aired on March 6, 2012, has been removed from rotation. The episode features the young dancers performing a burlesque-style routine and wearing sequined, flesh-toned bra tops and tights in an effort to make them appear nude.
– Wikipedia, Dance Moms

Yes, you've read correctly. An episode of this show (which featured 12-year-old girls) revolved around the theme of topless showgirls. Several other episodes were as upsetting.

In another episode, Jojo performed a dance routine inspired by Carrie. In this 1976 horror movie, a high school prom queen is drenched in pig blood. Then, she massacres her entire school using her supernatural, witch-like powers. Jojo claimed she had never watched that movie, but this wasn't about her. It was about her insane, occult-minded industry handlers.

A few years later, Jojo Siwa became a star in her own right. After signing with Nickelodeon, her popularity was converted into a highly marketable brand that released pop songs, a full-length movie, and various products— including some very unfortunate products.

In June 2019, the FDA issued a warning about dangerous levels of asbestos in a JoJo Siwa-branded cosmetics kit, prompting Claire's to recall the product.

In January 2021, the board game Jojo's Juice, marketed for children aged 6 and above, was withdrawn from sales by game makers Nickelodeon and Spin Master after a controversy over the game's content, which included questions about nudity. Who wrote these questions?

Despite her toxic brand (literally), Jojo Siwa remained extremely popular with young people and their mothers.

Then, her handlers decided to take her brand in an entirely new direction: Extreme LGBT propaganda (apparently, the full acronym is now 2SLGTBQIA+, but I won't be clogging with texts with this abomination).

Siwa flooded her fans with rainbow flags everything, combined with the one-eye sign. The message: She's now being used to push an agenda.

Siwa came out on social media in January 2021 as part of the LGBT community. When a fan asked what her label was, Siwa stated that she does not label her sexuality, as she "doesn't really know this answer."

If she's not even sure of who she's attracted to, why is her sexual orientation being aggressively publicized to children? The sad answer is that, once again, her brand was being used by exploitative handlers who turned her into an agent of indoctrination.

Siwa turned her trademark colorful image into a way of telling children that she has sex with women. 

Some might ask: What is wrong with Jojo Siwa being gay? Well, personally, I could not possibly care less about Jojo Siwa's sexual orientation. However, it was not about her being happy in her personal life. It was a purposeful rebranding effort carried out in the most cynical way possible.

In other words, none of this is sincere. It is all calculated from above and is highly performative. For instance, Jojo claimed that she wanted to trailblaze a new genre of music called "gay pop," which managed to anger … gay people.

Pop music has been super gay for decades, Jojo.

According to Jojo, Karma is the first song to grace the brand new "gay pop" genre. This historic moment was made even greater when she unveiled her new, edgy, super bad-ass LGBT alter-ego.

Nono Siwa!

With a terrible song and an even more terrible alter-ego, everything was in place for the worst video of 2024.

Very Bad Karma

Karma was teased on social media with a post that included a rather symbolic picture.

Jojo (or whoever handles her social media) posted a one-eye sign pic using light. So clever. The message: Whatever she was announcing was industry garbage.

Then Karma came out, and, wow, it's painful to watch. To feel less alone in the process of writing this, I'll be featuring some of the most upvoted YouTube comments. Like those two ones:

Alright, I've delayed this moment long enough. On to the video.

Karma begins with a shot of a tropical island. Above is a full moon we'll see throughout the video.

In occult circles, magical rituals are most potent during a full moon. And, as we'll soon see, there's an occult element in the video. Yes, this occult element was filmed like a Nickelodeon sitcom, but it is still there. It is about ritualistic transformation—the age-old "good girl gone bad" narrative as seen in countless other videos described on this site.

Jojo is on a boat, and her face is very close to another girl's face. Most of the video consists of awkward, PG-13 lesbian shots like this one.

Then, Jojo gets freaky with another girl who's about 4 feet away from the first one. Riveting drama is unfolding, people.

Music videos groom children.

Then, we witness a brilliant piece of interpretative dance which symbolizes Jojo being conflicted between two girls. Awe-inspiring stuff.

As you can see, everyone on this boat is dressed in white. In occult circles, the color white represents the purity and the innocence of the initiate prior to the ritual. Jojo is about to undergo the classic transformative process seen in countless other videos. The song's lyrics also allude to the "bad girl" we are about to witness.

I was a bad girl, I did some bad things
I swear I did it all for fun and it meant nothing

Then, Jojo throws herself off the boat. Nobody seems to care.

Jojo sings underwater for a while. Although this is all extremely corny, it is also extremely symbolic.

After throwing herself off the boat (symbolic death), Jojo is underwater—a womb-like environment—before rebirth. Then, the new Jojo emerges.

Jojo emerges from the water dressed in black. She's now the bad girl.

Jojo dances frenetically after crawling to the island because she's a bad girl now.

For a reason nobody understands, Jojo aggressively thrusts her pelvic area on one of her love interests. It's an upsetting scene.

While the viewers still wonder what's happening, Jojo re-emerges on the boat as if she were resurrected Jesus.

The full moon behind her head looks like a halo. Jojo Siwa is an enlightened being now! Let's see what she does next. I'm sure it'll be awe-inspiring.

Jojo brings the red-headed girl towards her while pushing away the other. To the ground. 

Yup, that other girl was just a hoe, so Jojo disposed of her. A great conclusion to a great, timeless story.

I don't want to get involved in this lesbian love triangle, but if I understood correctly, the red-headed girl got cheated on. Then she got aggressively humped on by an angry, black-clad Jojo Siwa while stranded on a deserted island. I have some advice for this girl, which applies to the world: Stay away from this toxic industry product!

In Conclusion

Jojo Siwa managed the impossible: She united America in absolutely hating Karma. However, in all seriousness, I actually feel bad for Jojo Siwa. Her entire career was spent under the control of exploitative people (starting with her own mother). Then, at one point, she was "handed over" to industry degenerates who decided to weaponize her popularity with children to indoctrinate them. She is not the mastermind behind any of this; she is bound by ironclad contracts, and she is doing as she's told.

Jojo is definitely not the first child star to get the "good girl gone bad" treatment. However, in this particular case, it was done in such a cynical and calculated manner that its true intentions are transparent. There are no sincere sentiments and no artistry – only sick people trying to groom children using the idol they used to watch on TV. However, as seen in the YouTube comments posted above, they're not falling for it. And her career might flop as aggressively as she humped on this girl because of this. With that being said, the lyrics of her song might take on another meaning:

Karma's a bitch, I should've known better
If I had a wish, I would've never effed around

The post The Cringy Symbolism in Jojo Siwa's "Karma" first appeared on The Vigilant Citizen.

2. Symbolic Pics of the Month 04/24

Syndey Sweeney rose to stardom by starring in Euphoria – a series laced with all kinds of toxic messages aimed at its teenage viewers. Also, it spends a lot of time depicting high schoolers in extreme sexual situations. Appropriately enough, Sydney Sweeney gets naked in the very first minutes of the series.

Since then, Sweeney has become a massive star, landing roles in movies while being featured in magazine photoshoots. Of course, that also means she must comply with the elite's symbolic agenda. This photoshoot in WhoWhatWear magazine could not be more obvious. Seriously, it's all there.

Sydney uses a glass thing to make a very clear one-eye sign. This picture signals that everything else in the shoot is about her being a puppet of the occult elite—literally.

A giant hand controls Sweeney like a puppet. This is one of the many pictures in the photoshoot alluding to Monarch mind control.

Coincidentally enough, here's the cover of Fritz Springmeier's seminal book about Monarch Programming.

A hand controls a puppet. The images are so similar that it's almost as if the cover inspired Sweeney's photo.

The goal of Monarch Mind Control is to create programmable alter personas. With that being said, let's look at the next picture in Sydney Sweeney photoshoot.

Sydney Sweeney is flanked by mask-like copies of her face. This is a classic way of representing alter personas in mind control.

Here, Sweeney has an eyeball in her mouth. In the movie Neon Demon (one of the most blatant movies about the satanic mindset in the entertainment industry), actresses who eat an eyeball are symbolically chosen by the elite. This reference is appropriate as Sweeney is currently an elite' "it girl". On the brighter side, the top comments on Instagram are all about calling out this crap for what it is.

Selena Gomez recently posted pics of her collaboration with photographer Petra Collins on Instagram. They're all about mind control.

Selena sits in a bath with a face on her shoulder. It represents an alter persona.

Selena leans on a woman (presumably Petra Collins) who wears a horrifying mask made of mangled hands. Those who program MK slaves are called handlers. HAND-lers. 

Selena looks sad while wearing a wristband that says "RISK." Also, the taped-on cotton pad implies that she was injected with something. This is all about her being an MK slave.

Aaron Taylor-Johnson is a British actor who has starred in popular movies such as Kick-Ass, Avengers: Age of Ultron, Tenet, and Bullet Train. In a recent photoshoot with Rolling Stones magazine, he did everything he had to do to remain in the entertainment industry's good graces.

Here, he makes a blatant one-eye sign with a face that says: "I know, this is pathetic."

Here, he mimics devil horns with a face that says, "I know, I sold my soul to be in Hollywood."

Here, he wears the obligatory women's clothing with a face that says: "This is humiliating." 

Speaking of humiliation, John Cena is a wrestler who made a transition to the entertainment industry for fame and fortune. But there's a price for it.

The "funny highlight" of the Oscars was when John Cena walked on stage naked. It was hilarious because he was naked. That's the caliber of comedy at the Oscars, a ceremony that also gave awards to a movie that depicted a child in a woman's body having sex with lots of old men. Of course, the Cena bit was unfunny and awkward. It was the elite's way of telling us that Cena is in the "humiliation" stage of his career. His appearing naked in front of his peers was the perfect way of highlighting this fact.

On the poster of his most recent movie, John Cena is dressed like a sexualized schoolgirl. Humiliation and emasculation – that's what's on the agenda for Cena.

As usual, the one-eye sign has been all over the place in the past weeks and it was performed by the biggest stars in the industry. The message: They're doing as they're told. Here's a couple of examples.

Unless you live under a rock, you probably know that Beyonce released a country album. And, of course, all of the media coverage was about her race. Because everything needs to be about race and division. In actuality, the elite is desperate to contaminate the country genre with its agendas and symbols and they're using Beyonce as a trojan horse. To confirm her status as an industry pawn, Beyonce made a blatant one-eye sign in Essence magazine prior to the release of her album.

This is the cover art of Cardi B's single Like What (Freestyle). It's just a big, fat one-eye sign. That's it. That's all she's about.

On March 8th, it was International Women's Day. Guess who Lady Gaga celebrated it with?

A guy in a dress. Yes, she celebrated Women's Day with Dylan Mulvaney, a guy who is famous for no reason except for singlehandedly destroying the Bud Light brand with a disastrous ad campaign. Lady Gaga is so sold out to the elite's agenda that she's willing to insult her fellow women for it.

On March 24, it was Palm Sunday, a holy day in Christianity. This is a mass media headline.

Apparently, the movie Late Night With the Devil generated exactly $666,666 at the box office on Palm Sunday. I'm pretty sure that's a lie – "they" just wanted this headline to exist for blasphemous reasons. The movie is about a TV show unleashing evil in America's living rooms. That's an appropriate way of describing mass media.

On March 31st, it was Easter, the most solemn holiday in Christianity. It is celebrated by tens of millions of Americans from all origins. March 31st was also Transgender Day of Visibility, a fake, made-up day of indoctrination that is celebrated by about 68 weirdos. Guess who Biden's administration decided to celebrate?

In an incredible twist of irony, Biden (well, the propagandist who handles his social media accounts) wrote that transgender people are "made in the image of God." Wow. The entire goal of trans people is to turn into the exact opposite of how God made them using drastic surgeries, aggressive hormone treatments, invasive puberty blockers, and numerous other unnatural procedures. 

As stated in previous articles, the elite has been insanely trying to promote cannibalism. Also, as stated in previous articles, a significant number of scientific publications have become tools of propaganda. That said, here are some recent headlines from the "scientific" publication New Scientist.

In a couple of months, New Scientist published THREE full articles promoting cannibalism – even stating that it "solves the food crisis" and that it is "environmentally friendly." Yup, the same scientific publications that try to convince us that men can get pregnant are also trying to persuade us to EAT OTHER HUMAN BEINGS. In other words, these publications are now corrupt, compromised, and only suitable for the garbage.

Special thanks to everyone who sent in pics!

The post Symbolic Pics of the Month 04/24 first appeared on The Vigilant Citizen.

3. The Blatant Luciferian Symbolism in Justin Timberlake’s “No Angels”

When Justin Timberlake was part of *NSYNC, he was America's frizzy-haired darling. His fans (mostly teenage girls) thought he had the voice of an angel and the dance moves of … like … an angel who dances really good.

During that time, America had another darling: Britney Spears. And, believe it or not, the two darlings became a couple! It was the ultimate early-2000s fairy tale, and it was almost as if their managers had engineered this whole thing for maximum publicity.

Justin Timberlake and Britney Spears were both members of the Mickey Mouse Club, a child star factory that groomed numerous celebrities for the entertainment industry.

When the two darlings broke up, Justin stopped being perceived as an angel. Indeed, with the release of Cry Me a River (which was said to be about Britney), people started to get a weird, creepy vibe from him. And, when he infamously exposed Janet Jackson's breast during the 2004 SuperBowl Half-Time show, he got a hefty dose of finger-pointing (although the whole thing was clearly staged).

Despite these setbacks, JT's solo career took off in a major way. I mean, JT brought sexy back. And that was not a small feat because we were all wondering where sexy had gone this whole time. He was even dubbed the Prince of Pop, a title that placed him in the same royal realm as Michael Jackson, the King of Pop.

In short, JT followed the typical path of a child star groomed for success – complete with mediatized relationships and the required humiliating events.

But all of this was a long time ago. When most of these things happened, the President of the United States was George W. Bush. Since then, we've had ALL KINDS of Presidents, and the world has changed drastically.

So, in 2024, is 43-year-old Justin Timberlake still relevant? Most will answer immediately with a resounding "NOPE." However, JT still has fans, and he still releases music that requires media attention and promotion. Sadly, in order to stay in the good graces of the industry, the once darling JT needs to pay a price. A satanic price. Hence, No Angels.

No Respect

As the song's title not-so-subtly implies, there is nothing angelic about No Angeles. Its core meaning is satanic, and the video's filming location turns this piece of "entertainment" into an actual ritual that feeds on real sacred energy.

JT pulls up in front of a mysterious building characterized by arabesque architecture. There seems to be a wild party inside.

This is not just a random, cool-looking location. It is the Angeles Abbey Memorial Park, a mausoleum in front of a cemetery. There are actual dead bodies all around this place, and, as we'll soon see, it's about to be thoroughly desecrated.

Inside, there's a wild party, complete with people drinking, making out, and everything … inside an actual mausoleum.

JT symbolically stands between two pillars (very Masonic) and looks down at the party. He points at a person as if saying "JT wants YOU!"

On his way to this chosen person, JT stops at a bar. The reason? The people behind the video wanted us to see that they've gone through the trouble of building a bar inside this sacred place.

Right above JT's head are two skulls and black ornaments, which hint at them desecrating the resting place of actual dead people. Also, it looks satanic, which is always a plus – especially considering what will happen in the video.

Meanwhile, another Justin Timberlake is roaming around the party.

The JT alter ego wears sunglasses. We'll soon see why.

Dancing With the Devil

So JT finally finds the person he's magnetically attracted to.

Among all the hot models dancing at that party, JT is attracted to this person with a strange androgynous look. Something's off.

JT and the woman (I think) start dancing, but things get rough: She suddenly scratches his face. Then, everyone is all like:

Everyone at the party is actually a soulless demon. Considering that it literally took place inside a mausoleum, this is not that surprising.

Usually, when people at a party stare at you like this, you do like the *NSYNC and go "BYE BYE BYE." But instead, JT is like, "Let me see how that situation develops." Well, it develops in the worst way possible.

JT's date turns into Lucifer aka the fallen angel. I hate it when that happens.

The angel starts spilling blood / black goo all over the place.

When the devil starts throwing up blood at a party, it usually means that it's time to leave. But instead, JT is like, "Wait, let me see how that goes." Well, it doesn't go well.

JT stands right under the devil spewing blood. Then he's unhappy about the fact the devil's blood is all over his face and his auntie's pearl is neckeless. JT doesn't seem to understand the gravity of the situation.

JT is not the only one that's splattered in blood. Everyone is. Then, everyone starts dancing again because being drenched in blood is cool and sexy.

Two people drenched blood kiss passionately, thus ingesting the devil's blood in the process. Yes, we're still watching Justin Timberlake video.

Once again, we are exposed to the occult elite's obsession with blood. Whether it is consuming blood or being drenched in it, this sick concept keeps popping up in mass media, and it is constantly depicted as a cool thing.

In case there are people still watching the video, there's a big twist at the end. And it somehow manages to make things worse.

The Big Twist

At one point, the director yells "Cut" and we realize that this is a video shoot. I'm so relieved.

Good news: None of this was real. It was just a video shoot, and these demons were actors.

Then, JT thanks everyone for helping him "bring his vision to life". His highly satanic vision to life.

Then, he goes outside and opens the trunk of his car.

A bloody Justin Timberlake is inside the trunk, surrounded by disgusting tentacles.

But hold on, that doesn't make sense. If Justin Timberlake is in the trunk, it means that … uh oooh.

JT sits next to the girl who played the devil. Seeing that she doesn't have eyeballs, she wasn't playing a role; she's actually a demon.

JT doesn't have eyeballs, either. He's the sunglasses-wearing alter ego we saw earlier.

The video ends on this unsettling note—yet another pop music video that's blatantly satanic and has nothing else to offer. No wonder Justin Timberlake keeps flopping, he's become yet another soulless zombie churning out garbage videos to please his rulers.

In Conclusion

On one hand, No Angels is yet another satanic video spewed on the public the same way Lucifer spewed blood on JT's face. On the other hand, No Angels is actually a revealing video that exposes the true nature of the music industry.

You see, those who churn up this satanic "entertainment" like to say that it's just fiction, it's just entertainment, and those who look too much into it are crazy religious fanatics. However, in No Angels, the woman who played the role of Satan was not an actress – it was a demon. And, when Justin thanked everyone for "bringing his vision to life," it was his satanic alter ego doing the talking. They acted as if it was an act, but it was not an act.

This is an accurate depiction of the entertainment industry as a whole. Those behind this satanic stuff act as if it's an act, but it is not. They actually believe in this stuff, and these videos are not "entertainment", they're outright rituals carried out for the masses. The fact that this video was shot in an actual sacred place proves that none of this is fiction.

In short, the core message of this video is that these people are not faking it. Because, in the higher-ups of the entertainment industry, there are no angels.

The post The Blatant Luciferian Symbolism in Justin Timberlake's "No Angels" first appeared on The Vigilant Citizen.

4. There’s Something Terribly Wrong With “Poor Things”

Warning: Behemotic spoilers ahead!

The least one can say is that mass media loved Poor Things. Nearly every news article gushed over it while award ceremonies threw all their trophies at it, including numerous Oscars.

Yes, they really want us to watch and love the movie. More importantly, they want us to "soak up" its messages and underlying philosophy. Of course, there is a reason for this: Poor Things conveys, in an admittingly creative way, the twisted worldview the elite wants us to adopt. And that includes the sexualization of children.

On a surface level, Poor Things bears all the makings of a great film. The wardrobe, the set designs, and the performances are all top-notch. However, on a deeper level, something is "off" about this movie. It provokes in many a gut feeling that they're watching something … wrong.

In a way, the movie wants us to feel that way. The music is strident, atonal, and dissonant, creating an unsettling atmosphere. Some scenes seem custom-made to be challenging to watch and difficult to stomach.

Bella (who literally has the brain of a child) plays with the penis of a dead man to then repeatedly stab him in the eyes using a scalpel. This is just … wrong.

While the movie was based on Alasdair Gray's 1992 novel of the same name, most of the book's political commentary and literary nuances were evacuated to mainly focus on a single thing: Emma Stone acting like a child and having sex with older men.

In many ways, Emma Stone's performance is reminiscent of Ana de Armas in Blonde. As explained in my article about this brutal movie, numerous scenes appeared to be specifically written to place Ana de Armas in situations where she is naked and sexually degraded. While the movie was about Marilyn Monroe, it was also about Ana de Armas herself taking part in degrading, near-pornographic scenes as some kind of Hollywood "rite of passage." And, despite the fact that viewers panned Blonde, de Armas was rewarded with an Oscar nomination for Best Actress.

As we'll soon see, Emma Stone underwent a similar process in Poor Things. She's often completely naked and involved in near-pornographic scenes (often degrading) involving numerous men. She was also rewarded by winning the Oscar for Best Actress in 2024.

Ironically, the movie is said to be "feminist." Although it was written by a man, directed by a man, and based on a book written by a man. But that doesn't matter because, through symbolism, the core message goes way beyond feminism. It is about distorting everything that is pure, good, and natural and embracing the exact opposite. Here's a look at Poor Things.

Ungodly Creation

Poor Things starts off with its funniest gag, which is entirely unintentional.

The movie begins with a stern warning about "tobacco depictions."

Oh no! Not tobacco depictions! Considering the horrifying scenes we are about to witness, some guy smoking an old-timey pipe is the least of our concerns. This "warning" aptly reflects mass media always finding ways to be concerned about the wrong things while completely ignoring the blatant evil that's staring right at us.

Right after this warning about *gasp* tobacco depictions, we see a woman committing suicide. I'm not joking.

This woman throws herself off a bridge and dies. At least there were no "tobacco depictions" in the scene.

The woman was pregnant, and her body was recovered by a strange man everyone calls God.

Godwin, aka God, is scarred and deformed due to experiments his father carried out on him. He's also a eunuch, making him asexual.

The character being referred to as God underlies the fact that he's the "creator" of Bella (and other things). He also likes to carry out experiments on humans, not unlike Josef Mengele.

Although everybody calls him God, a subtle dialog at the beginning of the movie hints at what's actually happening here. While discussing with his student Max, Godwin asks:

– Are you a religious man?

– I believe in God.

– Me or the deity?

Then a woman crosses their path and, after looking at God's deformed face, she says:

"The very Devil's work".

Godwin is not God. He plays God and, as such, is actually in opposition to the real God. As we'll see, his entire body of work is about corrupting the natural order of things and creating abominations for "science."

Around Godwin's compound are numerous hybrid creatures that really shouldn't exist.

But Godwin's most important experiment is Bella Baxter.

Remember the pregnant lady who committed suicide? Godwin placed the tiny brain of her unborn baby inside her head and reanimated her.

The result of the experiment is Bella, a literal baby inside a woman's body.

A Pedophilia Loophole?

At the movie's beginning, Bella can barely talk or walk, and at one point, she pees herself. She has the mental age of a toddler. But that doesn't prevent men from lusting over her.

Even though Bella was spinning around like a child, Max says that she's a "very pretty retard". The same can be said about the rest of Hollywood, amirite guys?! OK, I'll stop.

Right then, the movie stubbornly focuses on Bella's sexuality, including scenes of her masturbating.

In one scene, Bella looks extra childish and innocent as she blows bubbles in her bedroom.

Then, a man called Duncan comes in, sits next to her, and touches her private parts.

Alright. Let's stop for a second and ask ourselves: Is this pedophilia? Did the movie find a loophole to depict child sexuality in a mainstream movie by having a grown woman act it out? Yes, Bella has a woman's body but is mentally a baby. Isn't pedophilia morally reprehensible because children are innocent and cannot process these thoughts?

Before we can answer these important questions, Duncan takes Bella on an "adventure" in Lisbon, where we see them having sex in all kinds of positions.

In Lisbon, Emma Stone plays the role of a child having sex. You can rationalize all you want, but that's what's happening. And she won an Oscar.

The sex scenes are intercut with Bella exploring Lisbon while looking like a child. She walks clumsily and awkwardly, heavily indicating that her brain is far from being adult.

In these scenes, Bella is a bit more coherent. She has the mental age of maybe an 8-year-old, and she calls sex "furious jumping." While media critics found this term "endearing," it mainly indicates that a child is having sex with 56-year-old actor Mark Ruffalo.

Bella sends postcards to her creator, God, on which she describes (in a childish matter) what she's been up to. Yes, she's fellating a train.

While Duncan was having fun at first, things soured quickly. Bella's immature mind and promiscuous disposition led her to be intimate with another man. This caused Duncan to become bitter, jealous, and controlling. Meanwhile, Bella doesn't even understand what is happening but she does know that she's losing attraction to him.

Bella doesn't understand why Duncan is crying. She observes the world through the same cold scientific eyes of her creator, Godwin, devoid of emotions and morality.

At home, Godwin and Max (who was supposed to marry Bella) are also sad and broken.

In a way, Bella cuckolds all the men who develop feelings for her and want to tie her down. At this point, we realize that a feminist narrative is emerging, and Bella's development can be interpreted as the coming of age of a modern woman. More precisely, the elite's vision of what a modern woman should be.

A Whore and a Socialist

To better control Bella, Duncan takes her on a cruise where her movements are confined to a boat. However, he cannot control her thoughts. As Bella's mind matures, she is often seen reading a book—an image representing her desire to know the world. She also likes to engage in philosophical discussions with people she meets. Duncan doesn't like that.

Bella tells Duncan to move because he's blocking her sun. As the movie evolves, Duncan ends up representing the "patriarchy" that blocks women from educating their minds.

Bella's new friends also show her a side of the world she's never seen before.

While stopped in Alexandria, Bella is shown the plight of poor people.

The "poor people scene" above is rather odd. It's basically how a Hollywood person disconnected from reality would imagine "poor people." In this tableau shot viewed from way above, helpless people are lying down in a slum while a person stacks a bunch of dead babies atop each other. This movie does not like children.

Witnessing this misery (from above) makes Bella sad, and she now wants to change the world. As we'll soon see, the answer to her quest will be … socialism. Of course, we're watching a Hollywood movie.

Meanwhile, Bella and Duncan are penniless in Paris. However, Bella quickly finds employment: Prostitute in a brothel. Indeed, the madam of the brothel had the perfect argument to convince Bella to work for her:

"If you need money, it's the shortest route to do it."

Considering that the concepts of loyalty and morality do not concern Bella, this logical argument makes perfect sense to her. Duncan disagrees.

Duncan tells Bella that being a whore is the "worst thing women can do."

On the other hand, the brothel's madam says that Bella is "a woman plotting her course to freedom."

In the feminist context of the movie, Bella becoming a prostitute is treated as an empowering move that's in opposition to Duncan's patriarchal control. It is also a way for Bella to discover herself and the world.

The brothel is physically connected to the church next to it. Is the movie trying to tell us something about Christianity?

The brothel's madam also convinces Bella that the degrading things she must do for her clients are part of the "experience."

"We must work. We must make money. But more than that, we must experience everything. Not just the good, but degradation, horror, and sadness. This makes us whole, Bella. It makes us people of substance, not flighty, untouched children. When we know the world, the world is ours. Now, go and f*ck someone."

This quote sums up the movie's core message, and there is much to unpack.

First, what's wrong with "untouched children"? They're supposed to be untouched. This movie DOES NOT like children.

Second, this quote reflects the dualistic worldview of the occult elite, where it is believed that the bad, the evil, and the horrific are of equal value as the pure, the good, and the godly. It is by uniting the two that a person becomes "illuminated."

Finally, the madame probably doesn't even believe in what she's saying. She wants Bella to do degrading things so she can profit from her – the same way the elite wants us to believe in their indoctrination so they can profit from us.

The movie makes sure we see Bella being degraded in every way possible. Also, simultaneously, the viewers are watching actress Emma Stone being degraded as well. The movie's insistence on depicting sex scenes involving the actress takes on a ritualistic dimension where she's being initiated through humiliation.

One of her clients is an older, rather gross butcher who smells awful. After the encounter, Bella says that the sex was "brutal in a strangely not unpleasant way."

Bella (and Emma Stone) gets humped on by this guy while the audience is treated with full frontal nudity. Apparently, that's what you need to do to win an Oscar nowadays.

In another scene, a father has sex with Bella in front of his children for "education." While doing it, Bella gives sex advice to the boys who sit there and watch. More sexualization of children.

Also, Bella discovers that she's bisexual. Of course.

Bella's girlfriend is a socialist. She tells Bella that a socialist is "someone who wants to change the world for the better." To which Bella instantly replies:

"Then I am that too."

The movie's unabashed promotion of a specific political current is odd but unsurprising. Poor Things is not mere entertainment; it is creative indoctrination. In case you didn't notice, the elite has been hard at work trying to create a socialist world government. They want us to associate the word socialist with "changing the world for the better." If the movie had promoted any other political current, the movie would have been shunned.

So, Bella reflects what the elite want women to be. However, her actions cause Duncan to lose his mind completely.

Duncan ends up in the looney bin.

While Bella is the creation of a man dubbed God, Duncan sees in her the exact opposite:

"He has sent a demon at a large into the world. The devil wrapped in an alluring body that cannot be satieted and a mind that picks people apart stitch by stitch like a bloodied and burned rag doll shat out of an elephant's arse."

While the "demon" is at large, her creator is dying.

God is Dead

When Bella learns that God is dying of cancer, she leaves Paris and travels back to London. The fact that God dies in the movie is symbolic as, in the elite's philosophy, men are gods.

In London, Bella reconnects with Max, with whom she was engaged before she left.

Bella asks Max if "the whoring thing challenges the desire for ownership that men have."

Again, her being a prostitute is framed as some feminist power move that goes against the desire of men to own women. Max says he's okay with it because it's "her body."

Although they get married in a church, the black-and-white pattern inside of it indicates that this is actually about the occult elite's dualistic "religion."

After God's death, Bella takes over as the mad scientist. In the final scene, everything ends perfectly according to the elite's vision for humanity.

Bella lives with her socialist lesbian lover.

Bella placed the brain of a goat into the head of her mother's controlling husband. This man is technically Bella's father. But not anymore. He's a goat now.

The movie ends with a shot of Bella reading. She is now an accomplished socialist bisexual lady. Every man who tried to control her is either dead or completely broken. Or a goat.

The end.

In Conclusion

There's a reason why mass media tastemakers celebrate Poor Things: It reflects the culture and mindset the elite is looking to force on the masses. It is representative of a society that is steadily straying away from everything pure and natural to embrace the sick, the twisted, and, yes, the ungodly. From God's distorted face to the hybrid animal monstrosities running around to Bella awkwardly walking with an infant's brain – everything we see is in complete opposition to the natural order of things.

But that distortion is not merely esthetic. The movie also obsesses over twisted concepts such as the sexualization of children and female "empowerment" through sexual degradation. In this movie, a child discovering the world does not play around in nature; it plays with a dead man's penis while stabbing him in the eyes. Of course, not all movies need to portray happy, pretty things. But Poor Things' core message is that these disturbing things are good and desirable in an enlightened society.

At least the movie got something right: It warned us about "tobacco depictions."

The post There's Something Terribly Wrong With "Poor Things" first appeared on The Vigilant Citizen.

5. Poppy’s “V.A.N”: One of the Most Blatant MKULTRA Videos Ever Made

In 2017, I published an article about Poppy – a YouTuber who went viral due to her bizarre short videos which appeared to conceal hidden messages. The title of the article: "That Poppy": The YouTube Star Under Illuminati Mind Control. While, at first glance, that title seemed a bit much, it was the only accurate way of summing up the messages and symbolism peppered throughout her videos. Because, when one pieces together the narrative of these seemingly absurd and nonsensical videos, one comes to an inevitable conclusion: Poppy is an MK slave.

Whether Poppy is an actual slave or she's only playing a role is up for debate. However, beyond the imagery, there's something "off" about some of these videos as they hint at actual abuse suffered by Poppy. Indeed, in some videos, Poppy appears to be bruised or completely traumatized while, in others, she's being subjected to mild forms of torture.

In one video, Poppy reads the Bible for 49 minutes straight, without a single pause. Everything about this is wrong and creepy.

In my original article, I explained:

There is nothing "religious" about Poppy's Bible reading. As she struggles to read through the Bible's uncommon words, names and phrasings in her robotic voice, the process becomes an exercise in absurdity. As the minutes pass by and as Poppy gets tired of reading, one feels a bizarre element of voyeurism going on, as if one is watching a mild snuff film where reading the Bible for a long period of time is the torture of choice.

Following the publication of my first article about Poppy, more bizarre videos were uploaded to her channel. The last one was posted in 2022 and it is quite symbolic.

Titled "Capture", the video depicts a creepy masked man (presumably Poppy's "handler" Titanic Sinclair) capturing Poppy using her own hair. Pure mind control symbolism.

Despite the rather obvious symbolism found in Poppy's videos (to "vigilant citizens" at the very least), some interpreted them differently. However, with the 2024 release of the video V.A.N, there is simply no more room for interpretation. The video is basically "Monarch Mind Control 101", complete with all of the meanings and symbols discussed on this site for years.

Here's a look at the video.

Violence Against Nature

V.A.N stands for "Violence Against Nature" and that's exactly what we witness throughout the video. It is all about corrupting the natural state of humans for nefarious purposes. As we'll soon see, the song also contains a spiritual component where "violence against nature" is also violence against God's creation.

The video begins with an enigmatic apple that sits in a lab-like setting. In Genesis, Lucifer offers Eve the proverbial apple which leads to the Original Sin.

The apple starts to magically levitate while dripping with blood.

What is this floating thing and what does it represent? Well, we get a big hint about one second later.

In a quick shot, we see a syringe extracting blood from Poppy.

Does the apple represent adrenochrome? You know, that substance the occult elite is said to crave and that is said to be harvested from the blood of young captives of the system?

One thing is for sure, Poppy is a captive of a sick system.

Poppy is locked inside a glass enclosure with some dirt to simulate "nature".

Poppy is under the control of MK handlers – the lead singer of the band Bad Omens plays one.

The song was made in collaboration with the metal band Bad Omens and the MK facility is branded everywhere with a stylized version of their logo. In other words, the band plays the role of the sadistic handlers. They even own the MK lab. Considering the horrific mental, physical, and sexual abuse MK handlers subject to their slaves, this is a rather strange role to play.

One of the handlers is Poppy herself, but with black hair. MK handlers are often MK slaves themselves and this video really wants to be an accurate tribute to MKULTRA.

Patient: V.A.N

In the video, Poppy is identified as Patient: V.A.N – a slave who is being programmed to engage in ungodly activities.

The song's lyrics convey the sense that Poppy is an artificial creation that is in total opposition to life, nature, and everything good. The several references to God also point to the satanic nature of this program.

I am in your algorithm learning all your mannerisms
I'm already level with God
A million words a second, and I know your imperfections
Baby, I'm the only future you've got
Speak in diatonics, motivation diabolic
I'm religion better locked in a box
Picture-perfect image, more powerful every minute
Baby, I am everything that you're not

At the beginning of the video, blood is extracted from Poppy. Later, something is injected inside of her. Then, something symbolic happens.

After being injected, Poppy's eyes turn black – a classic way of representing the loss of one's soul and demonic possession.

Throughout the video, a dissociative Poppy is subject to all kinds of procedures and injections that gradually corrupt her natural self.

To make sure we understand that this is about Monarch programming and nothing else, several symbols that were discussed on this site ad nauseam were inserted in the video.

A butterfly (representing Monarch programming) hides one of Poppy's eyes, effectively creating a One-Eye sign (representing slavery to the occult elite). This symbolic image sums up the message of the entire video.

MONARCH. PROGRAMMING.

A white rabbit hides one of Poppy's eyes. Again, very symbolic.

As explained in numerous previous articles, the symbol of the white rabbit is extremely important in MK programming. In Alice in Wonderland (which is used as a programming script in Monarch mind control), Alice follows a white rabbit through the looking glass to enter Wonderland. While being programmed, MK slaves are told to "follow the white rabbit" to Wonderland which, in their case, is total dissociation. When this is accomplished, handlers can engage in the ultimate goal of Monarch programming: The splitting of the slave's personalities.

Appropriately enough, this process is visually depicted in the video.

The Fracture

In nearly every MK-themed movie and video I've described on this site, a specific scene inevitably happens: We see glass shattering. Then, the MK slave rebels and attempts to escape programming. And, through symbolism, we are told that this is all happening in the slave's head. A prime example of this pattern can be found in David Bowie's movie Labyrinth.

Of course, considering that V.A.N is Mind Control 101, it contains a textbook version of this pattern.

At one point, Poppy stares at Poppy … the black-haired handler. Their mirroring reflections indicate that they're possibly alters of the same person.

Handler Poppy breaks the glass using a hammer, recreating the obligatory "fracture of the persona" scene depicted in all MK-related stories.

Then, a lifeless Poppy sings while surrounded by floating versions of her. This represents her core persona being fractured into multiple alters.

Once the glass shatters, Poppy escapes and all hell breaks loose in the lab.

As Poppy escapes, a swat team equipped with flashlights searches for her.

But Poppy is now, apparently, a super-charged killing machine and she massacres the armed men. At this point, we're tempted to say "Poppy is a bad-ass who broke free from mind control".

However, a shot that quickly flashes during these scenes negates all of this.

Following the scene of the swat team holding flashlights, we briefly see a handler holding a flashlight at Poppy's eyes. The message: Poppy's escape is happening in her head. She's still completely controlled by her handlers.

The ending of the video might seem happy … but it's not.

Poppy runs towards the light as she appears to be leaving the lab.

Considering this happening in her head, the "light" above might be the handler's flashlight. In other words, she's running right back to her usual programming. She's stuck in a loop she cannot escape.

In Conclusion

Poppy has been creeping out millions of people for years with her bizarre videos and her increasingly robotic demeanor. Although there have been varying theories about her act, V.A.N simply leaves no room for interpretation. It is a confirmation that everything about Poppy points directly to Monarch mind control. Indeed, V.A.N is one of the most blatant videos about MKULTRA ever made and Poppy clearly plays the role of an MK slave. Not only that, she actually does a one-eye sign using a Monarch butterfly. I don't think they can make this more blatant for us.

With that being said, is there a moral to V.A.N's story? Nope, there is none. It's about hopelessness, loss of free will, and hating God's creation. In short, it is about celebrating what the elite ultimately wants for us. Don't let them inject you with whatever they injected Poppy with. Not only literally, but mentally and spiritually. Because they want all of us to turn into Patient: V.A.N.

The post Poppy's "V.A.N": One of the Most Blatant MKULTRA Videos Ever Made first appeared on The Vigilant Citizen.

6. Symbolic Pics of the Month 02/24

Barry Keoghan is an Irish actor mostly known for his roles in the Marvel movie Eternals and the Netflix series Top Boy. More recently, he starred in Saltburn, a movie that can only be described as a bloody orgy of elite debauchery. Appropriately enough, to promote this movie, Keoghan was featured in a W Magazine photoshoot that can be only described as a bloody orgy of elite debauchery – combined with a hefty dose of ritualistic humiliation. Welcome to Hollywood.

In this appetizing picture, Keoghan is eating what looks like a human heart. There's blood smeared all over his hands and face, as if he were a baby eating cake. Of course, this is not a baby, this is a grown man being used to normalize the occult elite's obsession with cannibalism and the consumption of human blood. I like to include Instagram comments on some of these pics to remind us that people seeing right through this garbage.

Here, Keoghan is just dressed in a red latex outfit that screams out "I'm an industry whore". Other than catering to the elite's gender-blurring agenda, the photoshoot contains some references to pop culture vampires such as Buffy (the mug). The elite loves vampires because they know that there's nothing fictitious about old weirdos sucking blood for "vitality".

This pic oozes "sexualized little girl" vibes, complete with underwear hanging from the bedpost. It's just a sad and humiliating picture, custom-made to turn on the aforementioned weirdos.

Here, Keoghan is literally bathing in blood while wearing lipstick and women's accessories. His face says: "This is the lowest point of my life".

The fashion world is also completely obsessed with the elite debauchery seen above. At Paris Fashion Week, Robert Wun (who dressed notorious industry pawns such as Lady Gaga, Beyonce, Doja Cat, Lizzo, and Cardi B) made it all very obvious.

One of Wun's "creations" is a bridal gown smeared in blood. Again with the human blood. They can't get enough of it. Traditionally, white gowns are meant to represent the purity and the innocence of the bride. In this case, it's been completely sullied after, presumably, a brutal murder. These people have sick minds.

This model looks like she got herpes from a cannibal. How is this "fashion"?

A male model walks in a red dress to which is attached a faceless red demon. To make things weirder, the demon is undressing the model as if it's about to abuse him.

As if to confirm that this is all elite madness, here's a dude wearing a dress adorned by a 666 one-eye sign. They cannot make it clearer for us.

Speaking of fashion industry sickness, Thom Browne's recent fashion show had demonic tendencies as most models walked around with "horns" on their heads. Even worse: Children were involved in theatrics that emitted strong "child predator" vibes. A picture is not enough, a video is needed to understand the creepiness of it all.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Vogue (@voguemagazine)

As usual, the one-eye sign all over the place in the past weeks. Here are a couple of examples from the dozens I came across.

Idris Elba is a big movie star and he was deemed the "sexiest man alive" by People magazine in 2018. So, of course, the elite had to use him. Some years ago, he was recruited by the United Nations and UNICEF to push various globalist agendas. More recently, he launched a clothing line with Calvin Klein and this is one of the pics used to promote it. The message: To get that fashion money, he must show submission first.

Several news outlets relayed the story of Maleesha Kharwa, a 16-year-old girl from a poor neighborhood in India who became a famous model. And most of these news outlets use this pic of her doing a blatant one-eye sign to show her "success". The real story: She was recruited by industry creeps to become yet another sexualized minor.

Ever since Kanye West was forcibly hospitalized in 2016, he's been … off. As explained in past articles, the "treatments" he received during his mysterious hospitalization were highly reminiscent of Monarch programming. And, sometimes, MK slaves end up turning into MK handlers.

The relationship between Kanye and his "wife" Bianca Censori reeks of a handler/slave dynamic. On numerous occasions, Censori has been objectified, humiliated, and dehumanized while Kanye is acting extra creepy in the background.

On her birthday, Censori was made to walk in Las Vegas with barely anything on. Also, she was barefoot on the dirty, disgusting floor of a casino – something that would satisfy the sadistic tendencies of an MK handler.

Censori's family noticed that the model has profoundly changed since meeting Kanye. Also, they believe that he's controlling her. He might be mind-controlling her.

At one point, Censori had short blond hair. As seen in previous articles, MK slaves are often identified with this exact hairstyle. Kanye himself had bleached hair right after his hospitalization, possibly to indicate that he was "reprogrammed".

The cover of Kanye's album Vultures 1 continues the handler/sex kitten relationship. Indeed, the focus of the "art" is Censori's bare butt while Kanye looks like an absolute psychopath with his Jason mask.

The situation got even weirder when Kanye's daughter North West got involved.

In a (now deleted) TikTok, 10-year-old North West raised eyebrows by drawing the rather explicit album cover. Furthermore, for some reason, she wrote that she was grateful for the song Carnival.

Here's the chorus of Kanye's song Carnival. Should a 10-year-old girl be "grateful" for that song?

Go, go, go, go
Head so good, she a honor roll
She'll ride the d*ck like carnival
I done did the impossible

When the city of Sevilla unveiled its Easter poster, an immediate uproar followed. Noting that the depiction of Jesus looked "effeminate" and "homoerotic", citizens launched a petition to have it withdrawn. While the artist claims that he doesn't understand the controversy there are a couple of things he purposely ignores. First, Jesus after the resurrection was mostly likely bloody and wounded from the crown of thorns and, you know, the literal crucifixion. I guess the artist minimized these things because they weren't sexy. Also, the whole loin cloth situation around his groin with the rope is very homoerotic. I mean, come on. In short, those who made and approved this are not Christians, they're the opposite.

This is Wes Boreland of Limp Bizkit posing in front of a weird naked baby thing. I personally wouldn't want to pose next to a naked baby thing but he decided that it was a great idea.

The picture was taken in Danny Elfman's studio. In the 1980s, he wrote and performed the song Little Girls. Here's the chorus of that song.

I, I, I love little girls
They make me feel so good
I love little girls
They make me feel so bad
When they're around
They make me feel like I'm the only guy in town
I love little girls
They make me feel so good

Although this song (and its very creepy video) is super pedo, Elfman claimed that he was singing about someone else. OK, right. Personally, I still wouldn't sing these specific words. With that being said, here's a recent headline of him.

I don't know the specifics of that case but, judging by this guy's face alone, I'm going to say "guilty on all charges".

Here are other things that can be found in Elfman's studio (taken from this YouTube video).

More "decorations" involving weird babies.

The studio also contains this creepy painting of a young girl crying.

The painting is by artist Mark Ryden whose style can only be described as Satanic/pedo/MKULTRA "art" (a look at his website will convince you). Seriously, he loves to paint naked young girls surrounded by satanic and MKULTRA symbolism. A full article could be dedicated to him alone.

In short, this studio and everyone in it are SUS as HELL.

Special thanks to everyone who sent in pics.

The post Symbolic Pics of the Month 02/24 first appeared on The Vigilant Citizen.

7. Super Bowl 2024 Was a Circus Involving a Clown Wearing an Inverted Cross

Considering that Patrick Mahomes was the MVP of this year's Super Bowl, one would assume that he would have gotten the most love and attention after the game, right? Wrong.

The player who got the most love and attention – Travis Kelce – made the game's highlights for … shoving and yelling at his elderly coach.

That doesn't sound right.

But that's what happened. Why? Two words: Taylor Swift. Yup, coach-shoving Travis Kelce is going out with Taylor Swift. This instantly made him a household name and a major celebrity around the world. And, after months of excessive media hype, Kelce and Swift made it to the Super Bowl. Consequently, a great number of viewers tuned in solely to see how that romance would play out during this mega-event.

And, boy did it play out perfectly: After a suspenseful game, Kelce's Chiefs scored a touchdown with three seconds remaining in overtime, making them Super Bowl champions. Then, Taylor Swift appeared on the field and kissed Travis Kelce – the moment cameras from around the world were fiending for.

Super Bowl 2024 became the most-watched TV event of ALL TIME. That is not a small feat. And, as the picture suggests, this boost in ratings was mainly due to Taylor Swift.

One could say that one couldn't have written a better scenario. However, some also said that this scenario was actually written … a long time ago. Here's a look at what happened during Super Bowl 2024.

The Power Couple

In my last article titled 2024 Grammys: It Had To Be All About Taylor Swift. It Just Had To, I explained that, exactly one week before the Super Bowl, Taylor Swift completely dominated the Grammy Awards and even broke a record. It was the perfect way to set the stage for her Super Bowl moment where she would garner all of the attention.

During the Grammys, there was a controversial moment where Taylor Swift snubbed and ignored Celine Dion – one of the only artists who still massively outsell her.

That whole interaction was symbolic: Taylor is a "chosen one". She's, in a way, "above the law" and she doesn't need to show respect to anyone.

Oddly enough, a similar scenario happened during the Super Bowl. In a bizarre moment rarely seen in sports, Travis Kelce shoved and yelled at his coach during the game.

Travis Kelce looked less than enthused pic.twitter.com/yncKhjtNl4

— NFL on CBS (@NFLonCBS) February 12, 2024

Any sports fan would say that's simply a no-no. The situation was so bizarre that former Eagles receiver A.J. Brown stated the obvious:

Kelce wasn't even kicked out of the field.

Weird fact: Shortly after posting this tweet, it was claimed that A.J. Brown's account was "hacked" – the go-to excuse for those who backtrack on their opinions. Maybe he got a message from above saying: "Mind your business A.J., this is bigger than you".

In any other situation, the coach would have, at the very least, benched the player for the rest of the game. But that couldn't happen that day. Like Swift, Kelce was "above the law". He's a "chosen one" and he didn't need to show respect to anyone.

Kelce is not just a football player anymore, he's a superstar.

Furthermore, Kelce simply could not be punished during the Super Bowl – he's got a massive, elite-backed contract to honor.

A couple of months before the Super Bowl, Kelce signed a contract with Pfizer for a reported $20 million.

While Kelce is peddling vaccines and shoving coaches, Taylor Swift is overacting her butt off during games for the cameras. It annoys most people, yet most people still want to see it.

To make sure Taylor was there, government officials and two private jets were put to work. She just HAD to be there – it was an international priority. And she made it. And, somehow, they've made this highly-anticipated event Satanic.

The Inverted Cross

As stated above, Super Bowl 2024 was the most-watched telecast in history. And it was due to Taylor Swift. So, when the camera inevitably cut to her, this is what a record number of people saw.

Swift was chilling with Ice Spice who happened to wear a massive inverted cross around her neck.

The word across the industry is that Ice Spice is an industry plant. And she was definitely "planted" next to Taylor Swift that day. The goal: To have a big fat Satanic cross broadcast in living rooms across the world.

Ice Spice was wearing a custom inverted cross pendant by jeweler Alex Moss.

As usual, the disinformation site Snopes "fact-checked" the inverted cross. However, faced with irrefutable facts Snopes had to backtrack and confirm the inverted cross.

When Snopes attempts to "fact-check" something, it's usually because there's something there.

During the game, Ice Spice also made sure to throw up the devil horns sign when the camera was on her.

Icon. @TaylorSwift13#SBLVIII pic.twitter.com/G0FzHIyiLB

— NFL (@NFL) February 12, 2024

The inverted cross is the main symbol of Satanism and, as explained in countless articles, it is worn by occult elite pawns to show that they've sold their souls. The fact that Ice Spice wore it with Taylor Swift – during the biggest TV event of all time – blatantly tells us that this is all occult elite shenanigans.

As if that wasn't enough, right above the inverted cross is a Balenciaga logo. You know, the brand that launched a full-on pedophilic ad campaign not too long ago? Why are people still wearing that brand? Are they trying to say that they support pedos?

Beyoncé

Other than Ice Spice and Taylor Swift, Beyoncé was another star who was at the Grammys and who continued the hype train to the Super Bowl.

At the Grammys, Beyoncé's outfit signaled that she's now a cowgirl … for like a couple of weeks.

While Usher performed at the Halftime show, Beyoncé stole his thunder by announcing a new album DURING the Super Bowl. Also, she starred in a surprise Verizon commercial. Of course, everything was symbolic.

The Verizon commercial features "Beyonc-AI", a robot version of the singer. Throughout her career, Bey has been likened to the character of Maria from the movie Metropolis (one of the occult elite's favorite movies).

Bey also released a visualizer for the song Texas Hold 'Em which consists of a short video loop that manages to pack a lot of symbolism.

In Texas Hold 'Em, a big decorative thingie hides one of her eyes, effectively creating a One-Eye sign. Also, notice her hands.

Bey's hand positioning is a mirrored version of Baphomet.

As if that wasn't enough weird Satanic crap for a football game, Kanye West arrived at the Super Bowl looking like this.

Kanye wore a black mask on which was glued a figurine of a crucified Jesus. As stated numerous times, Kanye's version of Christianity is actually pseudo-satanic.

After all of this nonsense, the Chiefs won.

Just Like They Drew It Up

In my last article, I described the theory predicting that the Chiefs would win the Super Bowl which would prime Taylor Swift for a major political move.

Before the Super Bowl, Vivek Ramaswamy claimed that the Swift/Kelce couple was fake and that the Super Bowl would rigged.

Some believe that the ultimate goal of this scenario is for Taylor Swift to endorse Joe Biden in the upcoming elections.

Well, the Chiefs won. Then, the official account of Joe Biden posted this creepy tweet after the Super Bowl.

Joe Biden's account posted a Dark Brandon meme with the caption "Just like we drew it up".

Most people who came across this bizarre post double-checked to make sure it wasn't from a parody account. Nope, it was from Joe Biden's official account. And everything about it was weird.

At face value, the post ridiculizes the theories about the Super Bowl being rigged and Taylor Swift being a "psyop". But, if these theories are indeed "ridiculous", why would the leader of the free world even address them? Doesn't he have, like, wars to deal with?

The sinister fact is that one can interpret this post at a very literal level where they're just openly revealing what they're doing. Some call it Revelation of the Method.

Even worse is the fact that the Dark Brandon meme originally emerged from places like 4Chan to portray Joe Biden as a creepy villain who does the bidding of an authoritarian Deep State. For some reason, the meme was co-opted by Biden's PR team and it is now popping up in weird places.

They're selling merch featuring Joe Biden with sinister glowing red eyes.

In short, the combination of Dark Brandon with the caption "Just like we drew it up" only confirms that those who believe in these theories are on to something. It's as if they're saying: "Yes, that's what we're doing and there's nothing you can do about it".

In Conclusion

Super Bowl 2024 was basically a circus. It started with a buffoon wearing big shoulder pads and tight pants comically shoving an old man. Meanwhile, a blonde songstress made funny faces next to a red-haired clown who wore a giant inverted cross. Then, another songstress attempted to sell her stale merchandise to the crowd by dressing up as a Satanic cowgirl.

During the intermission, the entertainers wore shiny suits and repeatedly yelled "Yeah!" for several minutes. The crowd was very pleased.

Later, a masked creep entered the stadium with Jesus Christ on his face. At his side, his zombie girlfriend walked silently with a blank stare on her face.

In the end, the hero and his princess won the big game and they kissed passionately. Then, the President of the World emerged from his sarcophagus with glowing red eyes and told the world that he planned the whole thing.

The post Super Bowl 2024 Was a Circus Involving a Clown Wearing an Inverted Cross first appeared on The Vigilant Citizen.

8. 2024 Grammys: It Had To Be All About Taylor Swift. It Just Had To.

Before the cameras even started rolling, most of us knew that the 2024 Grammy Awards would be unhealthily centered around Taylor Swift. It just had to happen. There is currently a heavy-handed media campaign surrounding her and a growing number of people are noticing that a bizarre, artificially generated frenzy is taking place. And many are wondering what's the end goal of it all. Is she being "propped up for something"?

It's a vicious circle: The more Taylor gets media attention, the more people pay attention to the media.

This whole campaign started with Taylor's super-mediatized relationship with NFL player Travis Kelce. This union between the worlds of entertainment and pro sports generated a media frenzy of absurd proportions.

Televised games of the Kansas City Chiefs constantly cut away to Taylor Swift reacting to whatever was happening on the field. It annoyed lots of people. Yet, lots of other people started watching these games specifically to see Taylor doing her Taylor faces.

The ridiculous media frenzy surrounding the couple – but mostly Taylor Swift – raised many eyebrows. It simply doesn't seem normal or organic. It seems fake and custom-made by media experts to generate a specific type of media attention.

Then, the Chiefs made it to the Superbowl – one of the biggest sporting events in the world. It just had to happen. And, while Swift was set to perform in Japan shortly before the Super Bowl, the Embassy of Japan told the world that there was nothing to worry about. Queen Taylor will grace the world with her presence.

Government officials confirmed that we will all get the Taylor Swift reaction shots we all want during the Super Bowl. And imagine if the Chiefs win?! OMG!

This unprecedented (and some say unwarranted) media circus led some observers to believe that this whole Taylor Swift extravaganza is actually a psyop – psychological warfare operation meant to influence the masses. The ultimate goal: At the height of her popularity, and right before the elections, Taylor Swift would support Joe Biden.

Vivek Ramaswamy believes this is all fake and that even the Super Bowl is rigged to make sure the world gets its Taylor Swift moment.

As if to prove the conspiracies right, the elite-owned propaganda outlet The Guardian published an article about Taylor influencing votes, complete with a one-eye sign pic.

Meanwhile, a video from 2019 recently resurfaced that is said to be proof that Taylor Swift is a propaganda asset. Titled Information Warfare Defining and Analysing, this NATO conference centered around the theme of "Silent Battle". One speaker at the conference stated:

"The idea is that social influence can help, can help encourage or promote behavior change, and the theory here is the sense that this sort of approach works as well with regards to misinformation."

As explained in previous articles, "misinformation" is the elite's Orwellian term to define anything that goes against their agenda.

A slide from the presentation shows a picture of Taylor Swift as an example of an "opinion leader" that can be "trained to spread desired messaging".

The speaker stated:

"I include Taylor Swift in here because she's, you know, she's a fairly influential online person. I don't know if you've heard of her. … This is a cropped image, but she's standing next to, you know, a 'Go vote' sign. And, actually, celebrities, at least in the U.S., regularly will post pictures of themselves with an encouragement to people to go vote, and this has a measurable effect on voter turnout."

The "Taylor Swift is a psyop" conspiracy gained so much traction that the actual Pentagon had to chime in. Indeed, Department of Defense Deputy Press Secretary Sabrina Singh told Forbes:

"Taylor Swift is not part of a DOD psychological operation. Period."

Some would say: That's exactly what a DOD psychological operation would say. This was followed by an onslaught of mainstream news sources denying the conspiracy and ridiculing whoever propagates it.

Then, the Grammys came about. And, if Taylor Swift was an actual psyop, the Grammys would have gone down exactly how it actually went down.

The 2024 Grammys

As usual, the 2024 Grammys centered around a very limited number of artists. And, as usual, the show contained its fair share of deranged industry agendas. Here are some examples.

During SZA's performance, the singer stabs a man. Then, sword-wielding women massacre several men who then lie lifeless on stage as SZA sings "Uh, I just killed my ex (my ex)".

This violent display is in perfect continuation of the man-killing agenda that has been observed on this site for years. The reason why these hateful and violent displays are allowed in mass media: fEmAniZm – the elite's hateful and distorted version of feminism.

Later, Lizzo came out and presented a Grammy to SZA. And everyone clapped.

In case you forgot, Lizzo is being sued for several things that she is supposedly against, highlighting the extreme hypocrisy of these industry "entertainers".

Only two days before the Grammy's, a judge denied Lizzo's attempts at dismissing the trial.

A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge cleared the way for a lawsuit by three former dancers against Lizzo to move forward after denying the singer's request to dismiss the case. The Grammy-winning artist, known for her uplifting messages of self love and body positivity, is facing accusations of racial discrimination, sexual harassment, fat-shaming, and a number other offenses in a lawsuit filed last August.
– The Daily Beast, Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Against Lizzo Advances After Judge Denies Dismissal

Why was Lizzo at the Grammys? fEmAniZm?

Then there was Olivia Rodrigo's performance of the song Vampire.

Rodrigo performed her hit single smeared in blood while more blood poured from the walls in the background.

This is a continuation of another elite agenda: The normalization of consuming and bathing in human blood. Rodrigo is doing her part to normalize this practice and making it "cool".

While Miley Cyrus won an award for her mega-hit Flowers (which was the most streamed song of 2023), the show culminated with everyone bowing down to … yes … Taylor Swift.

The Taylor Swift Ritual

More than 14 years ago, I wrote about Taylor Swift being involved in a fake, scripted "ritual" at the 2009 VMAs.

It started with Kanye West jumping on stage and telling Swift that she didn't deserve her first award ever.

This memorable event was all about humiliating her in front of her peers – an age-old component of initiation rituals. In my article titled The 2009 VMAs: The Occult Mega-Ritual, I wrote:

Taylor Swift wins the "Best Female Video" award and goes up on stage to give her thank yous. Kanye West pops out of nowhere, taking the mic from her hand, and informs her that Beyonce has "one of the best videos of all time". This scene has caused much controversy and has earned Kanye the title of "Douchebag of the year" plus the honor of being called a "jackass" by the President of the United States.

I might shock some people by saying this… but this "unexpected" event was… STAGED! There I said it. Did you ever watch a crappy reality show and had the gut feeling that the whole thing was scripted? Well, I've got an overload of that feeling while watching this scene. None of the people involved (not even Beyonce making her "I can't believe this is happening" face) are good actors. Furthermore, I've been following Kanye's career since his beginnings and I've retained one important fact about him: The only thing Kanye West cares about, is Kanye West. So if he had to throw a hissy fit about something, it would have been about him not winning. Not Beyonce. Him.

This scene is, in fact, Taylor Swift's initiation into what I call "The Circle of Chosen Artists". The pupil is humiliated in front of her peers and told that she is not worthy to be on the same stage as Beyonce, the queen of the ceremony.  Almost all groups, fraternities and gangs carry out an initiation process to test the recruit's character, strength, and worth. Swift's ordeal was to have Kanye ruin her first award ever and to be told that she didn't deserve this recognition. The rapper is known for bitching during award shows so he was the perfect candidate to make it all seem "unexpected".

Later in that show, Swift was "accepted" by none else than Beyonce.

After Swift's public humiliation, Beyonce, the queen of the ceremony, calls her up on stage to let her "have her moment". She appears from backstage (as if awaiting her cue) in a red dress which is strikingly similar to Beyonce's. (…)

Taylor Swift being called on stage represents the fact that she has now been accepted as an equal to Beyonce and has become one of the "chosen ones". The matching dresses also convey this sense of belonging to a new group. She has "passed the test" – the ordeal of being humiliated – and she can now reap the rewards of being an insider.
– Ibid.

In other words, Taylor Swift has been involved in bizarre, symbolic, and ritualistic events for a long time.

At the 2024 Grammys, we've witnessed an oddly similar situation.

At the 2024 Grammys, Taylor Swift was coupled with Lana Del Rey. Their outfits had a dualistic black-and-white theme happening where Lana looked as if she just attended a funeral and Swift was in pure, virginal white.

At the very end of the Grammys, Celine Dion came out to present the most important award of the show: Album of the Year. This was a big deal because Celine has been battling with serious health issues and has been avoiding events for months.

Celine about to tell the world what it already knows.

By winning this award, Taylor would become the only artist to ever win Album of the Year four times, thus breaking a record and making history.

So she had to win. It had to happen.

And, of course, Celine Dion said the words everyone was fully expecting: "Taylor Swift".

Everyone was expecting it … except, apparently, Taylor Swift. She seemed VERY surprised as she did that "I'm surprised this is happening" face she always does. This is all so fake.

Then, Swift walks toward the stage while dragging along with her a reluctant Lana Del Rey (who had just lost to her). It was weird.

On stage, Swift takes the award from Celine while completely ignoring her.

Swift's "snub" of Celine immediately made headlines because it was deemed disrespectful. I watched it live and, honestly, it truly felt awkward and disrespectful. It was also very symbolic: It was about a diva of the past passing the torch to today's diva.

During the acceptance speech, Celine and Lana flanked the new queen Taylor.

During her speech, Swift acknowledged Lana Del Rey as a "legacy artist and a legend" … while Celine Dion was standing there still being ignored. While Lana Del Rey is indeed a hugely popular artist, Celine Dion is the only person on stage who could be called a "legacy artist and legend". Throughout her career, Del Rey sold 41 million albums. Celine? 250 million.

In short, the 2024 Grammys ended with the coronation of Taylor Swift and the humiliation of her rivals and predecessors. She had to win and she did. And everybody clapped.

In Conclusion

The media attention surrounding Taylor Swift has become a topic of conversation in countless households in America and around the world. If a PR company was to be hired with the mission of making Taylor Swift even more visible and influential outside of her "Swifties" fanbase, a relationship with Travis Kelce would have been the perfect plan.

And it happened. And it worked. Way too perfectly. And, as if carried by manifest destiny, Taylor's team charged toward the Super Bowl with no resistance, setting the stage for a media event of epic proportions. While the Super Bowl itself is a mega-event in its own right, the most important "player" of the 2024 edition won't even play on the field. It'll be Taylor Swift. Will the game be rigged to give Taylor her media moment?

Coincidentally enough, exactly one week prior to the Super Bowl, the 2024 Grammys were also "rigged" to give Taylor her moment. She was given the Album of the Year award by Celine Dion, becoming the first artist to ever win this "prestigious" (not really) award four times.

So, is this all a "psyop"? Well, I wrote that Taylor Swift was a "chosen one" nearly 14 years ago. She is clearly being built up to reach a level of visibility that transcends her musical career. But is this all happening so she can eventually give her support to Joe Biden? I don't believe this is the end game. Swift might be propped to become a political figure in her own right. You think I'm crazy? I might write about this in about 14 years.

The post 2024 Grammys: It Had To Be All About Taylor Swift. It Just Had To. first appeared on The Vigilant Citizen.

9. The Top 6 Most Deranged Moments of the WEF’s 2024 Davos Meeting

Unlike most mainstream media outlets, I won't waste your time beating around the bush: The World Economic Forum (WEF) is a parasitic and illegitimate organization that is run by non-elected individuals who are attempting to reshape the world … in the worst way possible. It is rather difficult to overstate the nefarious aims of this organization which prides itself on "penetrating governments" like some kind of cancer while promoting insane slogans such as "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy" (my article The Top 10 Creepiest and Most Dystopian Things Pushed by the WEF provides a good overview of this organization's long-term goals).

While ignoring these creeps would be beneficial to one's mental health, it is simply impossible. That's because the annual Davos Meetings always manage to summon people who can actually make the WEF's dreams come true such as heads of state, CEOs of mega-corporations, and representatives of global NGOs such as the World Health Organization.

Also: A witch doctor who blows on people's faces.

As these guests sit on panels and preach their globalist gospel, two questions come to mind: Why do they all look so smug and in awe of their own intelligence? Their air of superiority says a lot about their mindset versus the masses. But, more importantly, why do their topics inevitably lead to less freedom, less quality of life, and more Orwellian control?

The answer is quite simple: Their ultimate goal is a dystopian world government where the masses are reduced to a sub-species that is only allowed a limited amount of freedom and resources while being subjected to constant monitoring and pharmaceutical interventions. In other words, they're trying to turn us into cattle.

To bring about this nightmarish vision, the WEF uses incremental steps. Year after year, the organization constantly attempts to normalize new outlandish ideas. Then, it uses crises such as COVID-19 to make them a reality. Their secret motto: Never let a good crisis go to waste.

Davos 2024 brought forth, once again, a slew of creepy and radical ideas that all have a point in common: They lead directly to a dystopian New World Order. And no, I'm not being a "conspiracy theorist", the words "New World Order" were literally uttered during Davos. Several times.

Here are the top 6 "lowlights" from Davos 2024. Why top 6? Because the WEF logo contains three 6s.

It's all in your face.

#6 Deranged Tapestry

Before I even go into what was said at Davos, we need to look at some symbolism. The slogan of this site is "Symbols rule the world" and, once again, the true, unfiltered mindset of the WEF was better expressed through one single piece of "decoration" rather than thousands of words.

Here's a screen capture of a Davos discussion that featured former UK Prime Minister Theresa May.

Why is there a depiction of the devil on the left wall?

Theresa May and her friends were discussing in a room decorated with the Walthamstow Tapestry, a large mural created in 2009 by cross-dressing contemporary artist Grayson Perry.

The Walthamstow Tapestry.

The artist: Grayson Perry. Seems like a well-adjusted individual.

There's a whole lot of insanity happening in that tapestry but, to sum it up, it depicts a woman giving birth to a baby whose trail of blood leads directly … into the devil's mouth.

Facing the devil are characters resembling the Three Wise Men. Also: Is that the Virgin Mary kneeling and offering baby Jesus to the devil? Our leaders are discussing the future of the world in rooms decorated with this crap.

The tapestry is filled with the names of actual corporations such as Nestlé, Vodaphone, Nike, Microsoft, and Glaxo Smith Kline. One can argue that the artwork comments on corporations and materialism affecting every aspect of our lives and leading us to an unholy existence.

However, because most of these companies are actually represented at the WEF, this tapestry takes on a very literal meaning. It's not a social commentary anymore, it's a blueprint. And they're proud of it.

With that being said, let's look at what was discussed at Davos.

#5 Disease X and the Pandemic Treaty

The Disease X panel at Davos. The alternative title of the session: "Scaring people into accepting the WHO's Pandemic Treaty".

When these WEF people look back at COVID years, their eyeballs turn into hearts. The drastic lockdowns, the mandatory masks, the orgy of vaccines … such fond memories. At Davos 2024, the WEF hosted a discussion about Disease X, a hypothetical illness that could lead to another global pandemic.

Among the panelists were Tedros Ghebreyesus (Director-General of the World Health Organization), Roy Jakobs (CEO of Phillips Healthcare), and Michel Demaré (Chair of the Board of AstraZeneca). In other words, the guests were people who would profit greatly from another pandemic.

The WEF knew what it was doing when it came up with Disease X. The panelists themselves admitted that it was "catchy" and they hoped it would garner social media attention. Well, it did. It annoyed and terrified people who are now convinced that the WEF is already planning another pandemic.

Former United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Public Affairs Monica Crowley posted on X:

"Just in time for the election, a new contagion to allow them to implement a new WHO treaty, lock down again, restrict free speech and destroy more freedoms".

In his opening statement, Tedros Ghebreyesus pointed out that the term Disease X was coined in 2018 and was meant to be a placeholder name for an unknown disease. He also added that COVID was the first Disease X.

Although Disease X is said to be unknown, the WHO weirdly stated that it could be 20 times deadlier than COVID. Where does this oddly specific figure come from?

The goal of this panel is quite simple: To normalize the idea that democratically elected governments should not have a say when a pandemic strikes. Instead, global entities of unelected globalists such as the WHO – along with private pharmaceutical companies – should call the shots and bypass governments.

To accomplish that, Ghebreyesus urged countries to sign the WHO's Pandemic Treaty by its May 2024 deadline. Ghebreyesus said:

"This is a common global interest, and very narrow national interests should not come into the way."

Re-read the quote above carefully. These exact words will be used over and over again to justify a global government. Any excuse will be good enough to use these words (i.e. climate change).

In the past months, critics have warned that the WHO's legally binding treaty would cede national sovereignty to this global organization and that it amounts to nothing less than a power grab. A letter published by the advocacy group Advancing American Freedom (AAF) stated:

"The WHO's proposal to consolidate power and erode the United States of America of its sovereignty through the WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty is untenable and raises serious and significant questions regarding America's independence of action and ability to respond to global pandemics".

In response to critics, Tedros stated:

"There are those who claim that the pandemic agreement and IHR will cede sovereignty to WHO and give the WHO Secretariat the power to impose lockdowns or vaccine mandates on countries. You know this is fake news, lies, and conspiracy theories."

I don't know, Tedros. Usually, when you people say "fake news" and "conspiracy theories", it's usually because you're trying to dismiss inconvenient truths … like the fact that you're trying to bring about a New World Order.

Speaking of which.

#4 New World Order

Those who say that a global elite is looking to create a New World Order are usually dismissed as "conspiracy theorists". But what happens when the global elite casually discusses a literal New World Order for all to see? What then? When does the conspiracy theory become a confirmed fact?

One Davos 2024 discussion featured Jake Sullivan – Joe Biden's National Security Advisor. He's not just a random guy. He previously served as Director of Policy to President Barack Obama, National Security Advisor to then Vice President Biden, and Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary Hillary Clinton at the U.S. Department of State. Sullivan also served as senior advisor to the U.S. federal government at the Iran nuclear negotiations and senior policy advisor to Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign.

In other words, he worked with the most powerful globalists in the world. Here's a part of their discussion about a New World Order.

In response to the moderator's question asking if we're entering a New World Order, Sullivan stated:

"The post-Cold War era has come to a close, we're at the start of something new. We have the capacity to shape what that looks like and, at the heart of it, will be many of the core principals and the core institutions of the existing order – adapted for the challenges that we face to day."

The WEF loves to tell us that we are the "start of something new". Of course, that is all propaganda. If there weren't media-generated "challenges" such as COVID and global warming, the WEF wouldn't know how to promote its new era. The motto of the elite is "Order Out of Chaos". They generate chaos to bring about a new order.

To the elite, a New World Order would be without nations or democratic elections. If you think I'm exaggerating, here's a video of Klaus Schwab fantasizing about brain implants that render elections useless at Davos 207. You cannot make this up.

So what would a WEF-lead New World Order look like? Well, communist China is a laboratory for totalitarian globalist policies and its social credit system is currently being tested there. Unsurprisingly, several guests at Davos called for technology that would make such as thing possible on a global level.

#3 Digital Control

Do you remember vaccine passports during COVID? You know, that time when millions of people suddenly turned into second-class citizens and were banned from travel and public spaces because they refused to be injected with a pharmaceutical product? It was a sick, abhorrent mistake, right?

Not according to Davos. For them, COVID was a test run and they want to make this permanent. During the Davos session "Fixing Healthcare, Digitally", the EU Commissioner for Health and Food Safety Stella Kyriakides praised the vaccine passports as an example of what should be done in the future.

Kyriakides casually pointed out that this whole project has been taken over by the WHO which is, once again, a globalist organization that operates outside of national governments. Is this normal?

As if to make sure we understand that Davos is about the elite talking down to the masses, the WEF brought out the literal Queen of the Netherlands to sing the praises of a digital ID. Why her specifically? No idea. Might as well bring out the Queen of Hearts from Alice in Wonderland while we're at it.

But let's listen to what Her Highness has to say about digital IDs.

Queen Maxima said that a biometric digital ID should be necessary to obtain financial services, for school enrollment, "to know who got a vaccination or not" and for governmental subsidies.

It doesn't take Nostradamus to realize that such a technology could easily turn society into a dystopia. With such a system in place, an unvaccinated person could easily be "de-banked" and denied government subsidies. In China, people who criticize the system see their social credit score penalized. Could that happen with a digital ID?

These hypothetical situations might seem paranoid … if WEF did not spend so much time whining about free speech.

#2 Censor the Critics

A recurrent theme of WEF discussions is, ironically, restricting free speech. Everything that goes against their agenda is deemed "disinformation" and it should be eradicated. At Davos 2024, the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen stated that fighting "disinformation" is the TOP concern of the WEF.

Of course, disinformation is a code word for whatever fact or opinion that goes against their narrative. Later in the video, she praises the Digital Services Act which controls and monitors "hate speech" – a term that keeps getting wider to engulf, once again, anything that goes against their narrative.

In another stunning video, an editor of the Wall Street Journal literally stated that they used to "own the news" … until these pesky alternative sources came along.

In the most ironic twist possible, what she said is pure fake news. Mainstream news sources are more opaque, dishonest, and agenda-driven than ever. Several outlets have turned into outright propaganda machines where "information" is only deemed good if it serves an agenda. Did you watch NBC News recently? I mean, seriously.

#1 Inventing Words

In this final piece of WEF insanity, a panelist wants "ecocide" to be considered a serious crime. OK. Sounds crazy. But what could be considered an "ecocide"? The woman mentions … fishing and farming. OK. This is REALLY crazy.

Yes, you heard correctly. Jojo compared farming and fishing to genocide and she wants to see these people punished on a criminal level. As we've seen above, the WEF specializes in creating extremely slippery slopes. And this is yet another one.

Jojo wasn't invited randomly. Her extreme views represent the WEF's long-term goals. If you've been following the news in the past years, you've probably noticed that the elite has been waging an all-out war on farmers, especially in Europe. None of this is by accident. The WEF is using the "environment" to vilify fishing, farming, and agriculture while churning out policies to destroy their livelihoods.

This is followed by massive land grabs by megacorporations and globalist stooges such as Bill Gates. The ultimate goal: To have humans feed off bugs and highly processed, barely digestible "food products".

They'll be the ones eating delicious steaks. Not us.

In Conclusion

This year again, the WEF put on full display the long-term aims of the global elite. While they love to pepper their speeches with words such as "freedom", "democracy" and "prosperity", their policies lead to the exact opposite. In the examples above, we've seen talks about the WHO taking over pandemic response on a global level, the implementation of a global digital ID that would control all aspects of life, the censorship of dissenting views on the internet, brain implants that render elections useless, and, finally, making farming a serious crime that is comparable with genocide. Does that sound like "freedom, democracy, and prosperity" to you? Or complete insanity?

Look back at the satanic tapestry depicted above. This is the life they want for you.

The post The Top 6 Most Deranged Moments of the WEF's 2024 Davos Meeting first appeared on The Vigilant Citizen.

10. Symbolic Pics of the Month 01/24

TMRW Magazine recently dedicated over a hundred pages to Khloe Kardashian, complete with an in-depth interview and a massive photoshoot. One might ask: Why her? What did she create? What did she accomplish? Well, we've been asking this question for like 20 years and the answer remains the same: Nothing. She's a celebrity because the media said so. Therefore, she's going to be used for occult elite crap.

On the cover of TMRW, Khloe has one breast exposed. And it is hidden by an apple. It's all very symbolic, occult, and even satanic.

During their initiation, aspiring Freemasons expose one breast and one leg. As seen in previous articles, numerous outfits worn by celebrities refer to this practice as a nod to the occult elite. Khloe's dress reveals one breast and one leg for this reason.

Khloe and a serpent bite an apple. This is a clear reference to Lucifer offering the proverbial apple to Eve in the Garden of Eden. In this pic, Khloe bites the apple with great enthusiasm, implying that she (and her coven of witches) are on Lucifer's side. This pic explains why the apple seen above, combined with the Masonic references, is all a nod to the occult elite and its Luciferian beliefs.

In this pic, Khloe is symbolically blinded and silenced using accessories. Her eyes are replaced by the all-seeing eyes of the occult elite.

In another pic, Khloe performs a clear, unmistakable one-eye sign. The message: She's a tool of the occult elite. Judging by the comments on Instagram, people are fully aware of that message. And they hate it. But these celebs keep doing it because they have to.

Meanwhile, Khloe's half-sister Kylie Jenner was featured in a symbolic photoshoot with Interview magazine. When they're not undergoing massive reconstructive surgeries, members of the Kardashian coven are hard at work propagating occult elite madness.

In the photoshoot, Kylie is assaulted by a giant disgusting bug. Forced contact with creatures that cause repulsion is a Monarch mind control technique to torture and traumatize MK slaves.

Here, Kylie is in a ditch, stuck inside a capsule-type contraption.

Kylie's father Bruce Jenner was also stuck in a capsule in the highly symbolic 2013 Kardashian Christmas card shot by Dave LaChapelle. Next to him is a mannequin wearing his Olympic gold medals. Shortly after, Bruce Jenner became a woman.

In the same Christmas card, Kylie and Kendall Jenner pose in front of a literal Illuminati pyramid. At the bottom of the pyramid is the iconic Wheaties box that featured their father Bruce Jenner.

Back to the Interview magazine photoshoot, Kylie gets up close and personal with a snake. That family really likes snakes … because of what they represent.

To confirm that everything seen above is pure occult elite trash, Kylie makes an unmistakable one-eye sign.

Speaking of the one-eye sign, it appeared everywhere in the past weeks. Here are a few examples.

To promote new Adidas shoes named "Predator", Real Madrid football player Jude Bellingham hides one eye with the shoe. Can someone please remind him how to wear shoes? He seems to have forgotten.

In the past years, Daniel Kaluuya starred in huge movies such as Black Panther. Therefore, he had to show submission to his elite rulers. The result: A clear one-eye sign on the cover of High Snobiety with a face that says: "Yeah, it's my turn to do this BS because I still want to work in Hollywood."

This is magician David Blaine's IG profile pic. It's a super-clear one-eye sign. The message? You know the message. But there's more to this.

To promote his show Impossible, David Blaine makes a clear one-eye sign. Nearly all of the comments called out the Illuminati symbolism. Another comment referred to Blaine being close to Epstein. He's not wrong.

Records show that David Blaine attended at least three dinners with Epstein. The one-eye sign means being part of that sick system.

To promote his new album Insano, 30-foot tall statues of Kid Cudi were placed in several locations cities including Paris and Los Angeles. The sinister statue, complete with glowing eyes looks demonic. Other artists such as Doja Cat used a similar promotional gimmick. It is the elite's underhanded way of placing demonic idols in public view.

A Page Six headline about people hating these statues.

The headline above states that Kid Cudi "sold his soul". Boy did he ever.

In the past years – despite not being gay – Kid Cudi appeared in public wearing dresses. Not just regular dresses, but super humiliating dresses. In this pic, Cudi actually looks like he just got abused by some industry execs.

Speaking of humiliating industry stooges.

Benny Blanco (a producer who is also Selena Gomez's boyfriend) wore this old lady outfit at GQ's Men of the Year party. Yes, MEN of the year. Is this another humiliation ritual? Yup.

Are you as excited as I am about Paris Haute Couture Fashion Week?? Well, that means that you're not excited at all. Here are some pics anyway.

The "star" of the show was a creepy robot baby held by a model. Some observers noticed that it was oddly similar to another creepy robot baby used in a "fashion" context.

Frank Ocean walked around with a green robot baby at the 2021 MET Gala (aka the annual parade of industry slaves). Why do these people use babies as fashion accessories? Is it because they're a bunch of pedos?

Maybe my comments would be out of line if guests at Paris Fashion Week didn't look like LITERAL MOVIE VILLAINS.

Yeah, that's the type of weirdo that would cheer for a robot baby.

Speaking of the pedo tendencies of the fashion world.

Do you remember when Balenciaga ran a campaign featuring children that contained all kinds of pedo imagery such as BDSM teddy bears (read my full article about it here)? Kim K doesn't care because she's now the brand's ambassador. Pray for her children.

Cosmopolitan is a quarterly fashion and entertainment magazine for women. It contains celebrity news, fashion trends, and relationship advice. Also, Satanic abortions.

Cosmopolitan Magazine posted on social media a series of pics that do not only promote abortions … but Satanic abortions hosted by The Satanic Temple. The pic contains a one-eye sign because, when all is said and done, this is all about the occult elite's obsession with child sacrifices.

The inverted cross on this pic symbolically tells us that these abortions are ritual sacrifices dedicated to Satan. Call me old-fashioned, but that's a pretty insane concept to be promoted by a mainstream magazine.

Special thanks to everyone who sent in pics.

The post Symbolic Pics of the Month 01/24 first appeared on The Vigilant Citizen.